renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-28 15:13:55 +08:00
Code

tick-sched: Clarify "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending" warning

Browse Source 
Currently, can_stop_idle_tick() prints "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending HH"
(where "HH" is the hexadecimal softirq vector number) when one or more
non-RCU softirq handlers are still enabled when checking to stop the
scheduler-tick interrupt.  This message is not as enlightening as one
might hope, so this commit changes it to "NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU
local softirq work is pending, handler #HH".

Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Paul E. McKenney 2020-06-26 13:39:41 -07:00
parent 5022b8ac60
commit bca37119c5
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
kernel/time/tick-sched.c
View File

@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
if (ratelimit < 10 &&
(local_softirq_pending() & SOFTIRQ_STOP_IDLE_MASK)) {
pr_warn("NOHZ: local_softirq_pending %02x\n",
pr_warn("NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #%02x!!!\n",
(unsigned int) local_softirq_pending());
ratelimit++;
}