2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-15 08:44:14 +08:00

nfsd4: fix lockowner matching

Lockowners are looked up by file as well as by owner, but we were
forgetting to do a comparison on the file.  This could cause an
incorrect result from lockt.

(Note looking up the inode from the lockowner is pretty awkward here.
The data structures need fixing.)

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
J. Bruce Fields 2011-11-07 16:37:57 -05:00
parent f8e6defe7f
commit b93d87c198

View File

@ -3809,16 +3809,29 @@ nevermind:
deny->ld_type = NFS4_WRITE_LT;
}
static bool same_lockowner_ino(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid, struct xdr_netobj *owner)
{
struct nfs4_ol_stateid *lst;
if (!same_owner_str(&lo->lo_owner, owner, clid))
return false;
lst = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
return lst->st_file->fi_inode == inode;
}
static struct nfs4_lockowner *
find_lockowner_str(struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid,
struct xdr_netobj *owner)
{
unsigned int hashval = lock_ownerstr_hashval(inode, clid->cl_id, owner);
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
struct nfs4_stateowner *op;
list_for_each_entry(op, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
if (same_owner_str(op, owner, clid))
return lockowner(op);
lo = lockowner(op);
if (same_lockowner_ino(lo, inode, clid, owner))
return lo;
}
return NULL;
}