2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-19 10:44:14 +08:00

x86/iommu: Fix header comments regarding standard and _FINISH macros

The comment line regarding IOMMU_INIT and IOMMU_INIT_FINISH
macros is incorrect:

  "The standard vs the _FINISH differs in that the _FINISH variant
  will continue detecting other IOMMUs in the call list..."

It should be "..the *standard* variant will continue
detecting..."

Fix that. Also, make it readable while at it.

Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Fixes: 6e96366933 ("x86, iommu: Update header comments with appropriate naming")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1428508017-5316-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Aravind Gopalakrishnan 2015-04-09 10:51:48 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 7f99f8b94c
commit b44915927c

View File

@ -79,11 +79,12 @@ struct iommu_table_entry {
* d). Similar to the 'init', except that this gets called from pci_iommu_init
* where we do have a memory allocator.
*
* The standard vs the _FINISH differs in that the _FINISH variant will
* continue detecting other IOMMUs in the call list after the
* the detection routine returns a positive number. The _FINISH will
* stop the execution chain. Both will still call the 'init' and
* 'late_init' functions if they are set.
* The standard IOMMU_INIT differs from the IOMMU_INIT_FINISH variant
* in that the former will continue detecting other IOMMUs in the call
* list after the detection routine returns a positive number, while the
* latter will stop the execution chain upon first successful detection.
* Both variants will still call the 'init' and 'late_init' functions if
* they are set.
*/
#define IOMMU_INIT_FINISH(_detect, _depend, _init, _late_init) \
__IOMMU_INIT(_detect, _depend, _init, _late_init, 1)