mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-16 01:04:08 +08:00
blk-mq, elevator: Count requests per hctx to improve performance
High CPU utilization on "native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath" due to lock contention is possible for mq-deadline and bfq IO schedulers when nr_hw_queues is more than one. It is because kblockd work queue can submit IO from all online CPUs (through blk_mq_run_hw_queues()) even though only one hctx has pending commands. The elevator callback .has_work for mq-deadline and bfq scheduler considers pending work if there are any IOs on request queue but it does not account hctx context. Add a per-hctx 'elevator_queued' count to the hctx to avoid triggering the elevator even though there are no requests queued. [jpg: Relocated atomic_dec() in dd_dispatch_request(), update commit message per Kashyap] Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Tested-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f1b49fdc1c
commit
b445547ec1
@ -4640,6 +4640,9 @@ static bool bfq_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bfq_data *bfqd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Avoiding lock: a race on bfqd->busy_queues should cause at
|
||||
* most a call to dispatch for nothing
|
||||
@ -5554,6 +5557,7 @@ static void bfq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
||||
rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
|
||||
list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
|
||||
bfq_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5933,6 +5937,7 @@ static void bfq_finish_requeue_request(struct request *rq)
|
||||
|
||||
bfq_completed_request(bfqq, bfqd);
|
||||
bfq_finish_requeue_request_body(bfqq);
|
||||
atomic_dec(&rq->mq_hctx->elevator_queued);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -2660,6 +2660,7 @@ blk_mq_alloc_hctx(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
|
||||
goto free_hctx;
|
||||
|
||||
atomic_set(&hctx->nr_active, 0);
|
||||
atomic_set(&hctx->elevator_queued, 0);
|
||||
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
|
||||
node = set->numa_node;
|
||||
hctx->numa_node = node;
|
||||
|
@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ static struct request *dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||
spin_lock(&dd->lock);
|
||||
rq = __dd_dispatch_request(dd);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dd->lock);
|
||||
if (rq)
|
||||
atomic_dec(&rq->mq_hctx->elevator_queued);
|
||||
|
||||
return rq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -533,6 +535,7 @@ static void dd_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
|
||||
rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
|
||||
list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
|
||||
dd_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dd->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -579,6 +582,9 @@ static bool dd_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return !list_empty_careful(&dd->dispatch) ||
|
||||
!list_empty_careful(&dd->fifo_list[0]) ||
|
||||
!list_empty_careful(&dd->fifo_list[1]);
|
||||
|
@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
|
||||
* shared across request queues.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
atomic_t nr_active;
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @elevator_queued: Number of queued requests on hctx.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
atomic_t elevator_queued;
|
||||
|
||||
/** @cpuhp_online: List to store request if CPU is going to die */
|
||||
struct hlist_node cpuhp_online;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user