mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-20 11:13:58 +08:00
[SCSI] iscsi: nodelay fix
From: tomof@acm.org I'm not sure about this. I don't think that NODELAY option hurts performance. However, open-iscsi does not use MSG_MORE properly with sendpage, so NODELAY option hurts the open-iscsi performance. I've attached a patch to fix NODELAY and MSG_MORE problems and the write performance results with disktest. I use Opteron boxes connected directly, Chelsio NICs, 1500-byte MTU, 64 KB I/O size, and the iSCSI parameters on open-iscsi web site. With only NODELAY fix, the performance drops, as you said. On the other hand, NODELAY and MSG_MORE fixes improve the performance overall. Signed-off-by: Alex Aizman <itn780@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Yusupov <dmitry_yus@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
96bad874e7
commit
b13941f635
@ -1385,7 +1385,7 @@ iscsi_sendpage(struct iscsi_conn *conn, struct iscsi_buf *buf,
|
|||||||
BUG_ON(buf->sent + size > buf->sg.length);
|
BUG_ON(buf->sent + size > buf->sg.length);
|
||||||
if (size > *count)
|
if (size > *count)
|
||||||
size = *count;
|
size = *count;
|
||||||
if (buf->sent + size != buf->sg.length)
|
if (buf->sent + size != buf->sg.length || *count != size)
|
||||||
flags |= MSG_MORE;
|
flags |= MSG_MORE;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
res = iscsi_send(sk, buf, size, flags);
|
res = iscsi_send(sk, buf, size, flags);
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user