mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-16 17:23:55 +08:00
crypto: rockchip - fix possible deadlock
Lockdep warns about a possible deadlock resulting from the use of regular spin_locks: ================================= [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] 4.4.0-rc2+ #2724 Not tainted --------------------------------- inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. ksoftirqd/0/3 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: (&(&crypto_info->lock)->rlock){+.?...}, at: [<bf14a65c>] rk_crypto_tasklet_cb+0x24/0xb4 [rk_crypto] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [<c007f4ac>] lock_acquire+0x178/0x218 [<c0759bac>] _raw_spin_lock+0x54/0x64 [<bf14af88>] rk_handle_req+0x7c/0xbc [rk_crypto] [<bf14b040>] rk_des_ecb_encrypt+0x2c/0x30 [rk_crypto] [<bf14b05c>] rk_aes_ecb_encrypt+0x18/0x1c [rk_crypto] [<c028c820>] skcipher_encrypt_ablkcipher+0x64/0x68 [<c0290770>] __test_skcipher+0x2a8/0x8dc [<c0292e94>] test_skcipher+0x38/0xc4 [<c0292fb0>] alg_test_skcipher+0x90/0xb0 [<c0292158>] alg_test+0x1e8/0x280 [<c028f6f4>] cryptomgr_test+0x34/0x54 [<c004bbe8>] kthread+0xf4/0x10c [<c0010010>] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24 irq event stamp: 10672 hardirqs last enabled at (10672): [<c002fac8>] tasklet_action+0x48/0x104 hardirqs last disabled at (10671): [<c002faa0>] tasklet_action+0x20/0x104 softirqs last enabled at (10658): [<c002ef84>] __do_softirq+0x358/0x49c softirqs last disabled at (10669): [<c002f108>] run_ksoftirqd+0x40/0x80 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(&crypto_info->lock)->rlock); <Interrupt> lock(&(&crypto_info->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** Fix this by moving to irq-disabling spinlocks. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ab87298cb
commit
ac7c8e6b6d
@ -190,12 +190,13 @@ static void rk_crypto_tasklet_cb(unsigned long data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rk_crypto_info *dev = (struct rk_crypto_info *)data;
|
||||
struct crypto_async_request *async_req, *backlog;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&dev->lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
|
||||
backlog = crypto_get_backlog(&dev->queue);
|
||||
async_req = crypto_dequeue_request(&dev->queue);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
|
||||
if (!async_req) {
|
||||
dev_err(dev->dev, "async_req is NULL !!\n");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static void rk_crypto_complete(struct rk_crypto_info *dev, int err)
|
||||
static int rk_handle_req(struct rk_crypto_info *dev,
|
||||
struct ablkcipher_request *req)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!IS_ALIGNED(req->nbytes, dev->align_size))
|
||||
@ -38,9 +39,9 @@ static int rk_handle_req(struct rk_crypto_info *dev,
|
||||
dev->aligned = 1;
|
||||
dev->ablk_req = req;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&dev->lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
|
||||
err = ablkcipher_enqueue_request(&dev->queue, req);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
|
||||
tasklet_schedule(&dev->crypto_tasklet);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -267,12 +268,13 @@ static int rk_set_data_start(struct rk_crypto_info *dev)
|
||||
|
||||
static int rk_ablk_start(struct rk_crypto_info *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&dev->lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->lock, flags);
|
||||
rk_ablk_hw_init(dev);
|
||||
err = rk_set_data_start(dev);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dev->lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->lock, flags);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user