mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-12 23:33:55 +08:00
mm/memory_hotplug.c: move register_memory_resource out of the lock_memory_hotplug
We don't need to do register_memory_resource() under lock_memory_hotplug() since it has its own lock and doesn't make any callbacks. Also register_memory_resource return NULL on failure so we don't have anything to cleanup at this point. The reason for this rfc is I was doing some experiments with hotplugging of memory on some of our larger systems. While it seems to work, it can be quite slow. With some preliminary digging I found that lock_memory_hotplug is clearly ripe for breakup. It could be broken up per nid or something but it also covers the online_page_callback. The online_page_callback shouldn't be very hard to break out. Also there is the issue of various structures(wmarks come to mind) that are only updated under the lock_memory_hotplug that would need to be dealt with. Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Hedi <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
354f17e1e2
commit
ac13c4622b
@ -1107,17 +1107,18 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_memory_hotplug();
|
||||
|
||||
res = register_memory_resource(start, size);
|
||||
ret = -EEXIST;
|
||||
if (!res)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
{ /* Stupid hack to suppress address-never-null warning */
|
||||
void *p = NODE_DATA(nid);
|
||||
new_pgdat = !p;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lock_memory_hotplug();
|
||||
|
||||
new_node = !node_online(nid);
|
||||
if (new_node) {
|
||||
pgdat = hotadd_new_pgdat(nid, start);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user