mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-18 15:44:02 +08:00
[PATCH] clean up lock_cpu_hotplug() in cpufreq
There are some callers in cpufreq hotplug notify path that the lowest function calls lock_cpu_hotplug(). The lock is already held during cpu_up() and cpu_down() calls when the notify calls are broadcast to registered clients. Ideally if possible, we could disable_preempt() at the highest caller and make sure we dont sleep in the path down in cpufreq->driver_target() calls but the calls are so intertwined and cumbersome to cleanup. Hence we consistently use lock_cpu_hotplug() and unlock_cpu_hotplug() in all places. - Removed export of cpucontrol semaphore and made it static. - removed explicit uses of up/down with lock_cpu_hotplug() so we can keep track of the the callers in same thread context and just keep refcounts without calling a down() that causes a deadlock. - Removed current_in_hotplug() uses - Removed PF_HOTPLUG_CPU in sched.h introduced for the current_in_hotplug() temporary workaround. Tested with insmod of cpufreq_stat.ko, and logical online/offline to make sure we dont have any hang situations. Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linuxpower.ca> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e0f39591cc
commit
a9d9baa1e8
@ -1113,21 +1113,13 @@ int __cpufreq_driver_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval = -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are already in context of hotplug thread, we dont need to
|
||||
* acquire the hotplug lock. Otherwise acquire cpucontrol to prevent
|
||||
* hotplug from removing this cpu that we are working on.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!current_in_cpu_hotplug())
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
dprintk("target for CPU %u: %u kHz, relation %u\n", policy->cpu,
|
||||
target_freq, relation);
|
||||
if (cpu_online(policy->cpu) && cpufreq_driver->target)
|
||||
retval = cpufreq_driver->target(policy, target_freq, relation);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!current_in_cpu_hotplug())
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -65,10 +65,9 @@ extern struct sysdev_class cpu_sysdev_class;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
|
||||
/* Stop CPUs going up and down. */
|
||||
extern struct semaphore cpucontrol;
|
||||
#define lock_cpu_hotplug() down(&cpucontrol)
|
||||
#define unlock_cpu_hotplug() up(&cpucontrol)
|
||||
#define lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible() down_interruptible(&cpucontrol)
|
||||
extern void lock_cpu_hotplug(void);
|
||||
extern void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void);
|
||||
extern int lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible(void);
|
||||
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) { \
|
||||
static struct notifier_block fn##_nb = \
|
||||
{ .notifier_call = fn, .priority = pri }; \
|
||||
|
@ -908,7 +908,6 @@ do { if (atomic_dec_and_test(&(tsk)->usage)) __put_task_struct(tsk); } while(0)
|
||||
#define PF_SYNCWRITE 0x00200000 /* I am doing a sync write */
|
||||
#define PF_BORROWED_MM 0x00400000 /* I am a kthread doing use_mm */
|
||||
#define PF_RANDOMIZE 0x00800000 /* randomize virtual address space */
|
||||
#define PF_HOTPLUG_CPU 0x01000000 /* Currently performing CPU hotplug */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Only the _current_ task can read/write to tsk->flags, but other
|
||||
|
83
kernel/cpu.c
83
kernel/cpu.c
@ -16,47 +16,76 @@
|
||||
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/* This protects CPUs going up and down... */
|
||||
DECLARE_MUTEX(cpucontrol);
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpucontrol);
|
||||
static DECLARE_MUTEX(cpucontrol);
|
||||
|
||||
static struct notifier_block *cpu_chain;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Used to check by callers if they need to acquire the cpucontrol
|
||||
* or not to protect a cpu from being removed. Its sometimes required to
|
||||
* call these functions both for normal operations, and in response to
|
||||
* a cpu being added/removed. If the context of the call is in the same
|
||||
* thread context as a CPU hotplug thread, we dont need to take the lock
|
||||
* since its already protected
|
||||
* check drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c for its usage - Ashok Raj
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
|
||||
static struct task_struct *lock_cpu_hotplug_owner;
|
||||
static int lock_cpu_hotplug_depth;
|
||||
|
||||
int current_in_cpu_hotplug(void)
|
||||
static int __lock_cpu_hotplug(int interruptible)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (current->flags & PF_HOTPLUG_CPU);
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (lock_cpu_hotplug_owner != current) {
|
||||
if (interruptible)
|
||||
ret = down_interruptible(&cpucontrol);
|
||||
else
|
||||
down(&cpucontrol);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set only if we succeed in locking
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug_depth++;
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug_owner = current;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(current_in_cpu_hotplug);
|
||||
void lock_cpu_hotplug(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__lock_cpu_hotplug(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_cpu_hotplug);
|
||||
|
||||
void unlock_cpu_hotplug(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (--lock_cpu_hotplug_depth == 0) {
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug_owner = NULL;
|
||||
up(&cpucontrol);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unlock_cpu_hotplug);
|
||||
|
||||
int lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return __lock_cpu_hotplug(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible);
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Need to know about CPUs going up/down? */
|
||||
int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((ret = down_interruptible(&cpucontrol)) != 0)
|
||||
if ((ret = lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible()) != 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
ret = notifier_chain_register(&cpu_chain, nb);
|
||||
up(&cpucontrol);
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
|
||||
|
||||
void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
down(&cpucontrol);
|
||||
lock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
notifier_chain_unregister(&cpu_chain, nb);
|
||||
up(&cpucontrol);
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_cpu_notifier);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -112,13 +141,6 @@ int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Leave a trace in current->flags indicating we are already in
|
||||
* process of performing CPU hotplug. Callers can check if cpucontrol
|
||||
* is already acquired by current thread, and if so not cause
|
||||
* a dead lock by not acquiring the lock
|
||||
*/
|
||||
current->flags |= PF_HOTPLUG_CPU;
|
||||
err = notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_DOWN_PREPARE,
|
||||
(void *)(long)cpu);
|
||||
if (err == NOTIFY_BAD) {
|
||||
@ -171,7 +193,6 @@ out_thread:
|
||||
out_allowed:
|
||||
set_cpus_allowed(current, old_allowed);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
current->flags &= ~PF_HOTPLUG_CPU;
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -182,7 +203,7 @@ int __devinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
void *hcpu = (void *)(long)cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((ret = down_interruptible(&cpucontrol)) != 0)
|
||||
if ((ret = lock_cpu_hotplug_interruptible()) != 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_present(cpu)) {
|
||||
@ -190,11 +211,6 @@ int __devinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Leave a trace in current->flags indicating we are already in
|
||||
* process of performing CPU hotplug.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
current->flags |= PF_HOTPLUG_CPU;
|
||||
ret = notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_PREPARE, hcpu);
|
||||
if (ret == NOTIFY_BAD) {
|
||||
printk("%s: attempt to bring up CPU %u failed\n",
|
||||
@ -217,7 +233,6 @@ out_notify:
|
||||
if (ret != 0)
|
||||
notifier_call_chain(&cpu_chain, CPU_UP_CANCELED, hcpu);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
current->flags &= ~PF_HOTPLUG_CPU;
|
||||
up(&cpucontrol);
|
||||
unlock_cpu_hotplug();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user