mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-20 16:46:23 +08:00
[PATCH] mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately
mthca: initialize send and receive queue locks separately lockdep identifies a lock by the call site of its initialization. By initializing the send and receive queue locks in mthca_wq_init() we confuse lockdep. It warns that that the ordered acquiry of both locks in mthca_modify_qp() is recursive acquiry of one lock: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] --------------------------------------------- modprobe/1192 is trying to acquire lock: (&wq->lock){....}, at: [<f892b4db>] mthca_modify_qp+0x60/0xa7b [ib_mthca] but task is already holding lock: (&wq->lock){....}, at: [<f892b4ce>] mthca_modify_qp+0x53/0xa7b [ib_mthca] Initializing the locks separately in mthca_alloc_qp_common() stops the warning and will let lockdep enforce proper ordering on paths that acquire both locks. Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com> Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dd8041f16b
commit
a46f9484f8
@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void *get_send_wqe(struct mthca_qp *qp, int n)
|
||||
|
||||
static void mthca_wq_init(struct mthca_wq *wq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&wq->lock);
|
||||
/* mthca_alloc_qp_common() initializes the locks */
|
||||
wq->next_ind = 0;
|
||||
wq->last_comp = wq->max - 1;
|
||||
wq->head = 0;
|
||||
@ -1114,6 +1114,9 @@ static int mthca_alloc_qp_common(struct mthca_dev *dev,
|
||||
qp->sq_policy = send_policy;
|
||||
mthca_wq_init(&qp->sq);
|
||||
mthca_wq_init(&qp->rq);
|
||||
/* these are initialized separately so lockdep can tell them apart */
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&qp->sq.lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&qp->rq.lock);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = mthca_map_memfree(dev, qp);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user