mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-15 08:44:14 +08:00
rtc: ds1307: Remove non-valid ACPI IDs
The commit 9c19b8930d
("rtc: ds1307: Add ACPI support") added invalid
ACPI IDs (all of them are abusing ACPI specification). Moreover there is
not even a single evidence that vendor registered any of such devices.
Remove broken ACPI IDs from the driver. For prototyping one may use PRP0001
with device properties adhering to a DT binding. The following patches
will add support of that to the driver.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>
Link: https://uefi.org/PNP_ACPI_Registry
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201116142859.31257-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
bfca1c924d
commit
a31111189b
@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
|
||||
* Copyright (C) 2012 Bertrand Achard (nvram access fixes)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
#include <linux/acpi.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/bcd.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/i2c.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/init.h>
|
||||
@ -1169,31 +1168,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id ds1307_of_match[] = {
|
||||
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ds1307_of_match);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
|
||||
static const struct acpi_device_id ds1307_acpi_ids[] = {
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1307", .driver_data = ds_1307 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1308", .driver_data = ds_1308 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1337", .driver_data = ds_1337 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1338", .driver_data = ds_1338 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1339", .driver_data = ds_1339 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1388", .driver_data = ds_1388 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1340", .driver_data = ds_1340 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS1341", .driver_data = ds_1341 },
|
||||
{ .id = "DS3231", .driver_data = ds_3231 },
|
||||
{ .id = "M41T0", .driver_data = m41t0 },
|
||||
{ .id = "M41T00", .driver_data = m41t00 },
|
||||
{ .id = "M41T11", .driver_data = m41t11 },
|
||||
{ .id = "MCP7940X", .driver_data = mcp794xx },
|
||||
{ .id = "MCP7941X", .driver_data = mcp794xx },
|
||||
{ .id = "PT7C4338", .driver_data = ds_1307 },
|
||||
{ .id = "RX8025", .driver_data = rx_8025 },
|
||||
{ .id = "ISL12057", .driver_data = ds_1337 },
|
||||
{ .id = "RX8130", .driver_data = rx_8130 },
|
||||
{ }
|
||||
};
|
||||
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ds1307_acpi_ids);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The ds1337 and ds1339 both have two alarms, but we only use the first
|
||||
* one (with a "seconds" field). For ds1337 we expect nINTA is our alarm
|
||||
@ -1794,14 +1768,7 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
|
||||
chip = &chips[id->driver_data];
|
||||
ds1307->type = id->driver_data;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
|
||||
|
||||
acpi_id = acpi_match_device(ACPI_PTR(ds1307_acpi_ids),
|
||||
ds1307->dev);
|
||||
if (!acpi_id)
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
chip = &chips[acpi_id->driver_data];
|
||||
ds1307->type = acpi_id->driver_data;
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
want_irq = client->irq > 0 && chip->alarm;
|
||||
@ -2065,7 +2032,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver ds1307_driver = {
|
||||
.driver = {
|
||||
.name = "rtc-ds1307",
|
||||
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ds1307_of_match),
|
||||
.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ds1307_acpi_ids),
|
||||
},
|
||||
.probe = ds1307_probe,
|
||||
.id_table = ds1307_id,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user