mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-07 21:24:00 +08:00
loop: remove lo_refcount and avoid lo_mutex in ->open / ->release
lo_refcount counts how many openers a loop device has, but that count is already provided by the block layer in the bd_openers field of the whole-disk block_device. Remove lo_refcount and allow opens to succeed even on devices beeing deleted - now that ->free_disk is implemented we can handle that race gracefull and all I/O on it will just fail. Similarly there is a small race window now where loop_control_remove does not synchronize the delete vs the remove due do bd_openers not being under lo_mutex protection, but we can handle that just as gracefully. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330052917.2566582-15-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
158eaeba4b
commit
a0e286b6a5
@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
|
||||
* <dev>/do something like mkfs/losetup -d <dev> causing the losetup -d
|
||||
* command to fail with EBUSY.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 1) {
|
||||
if (disk_openers(lo->lo_disk) > 1) {
|
||||
lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR;
|
||||
loop_global_unlock(lo, true);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -1725,33 +1725,15 @@ static int lo_compat_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode,
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct loop_device *lo = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
err = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state == Lo_deleting)
|
||||
err = -ENXIO;
|
||||
else
|
||||
atomic_inc(&lo->lo_refcnt);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct loop_device *lo = disk->private_data;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
if (disk_openers(disk) > 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR) {
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_bound)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state == Lo_bound && (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_AUTOCLEAR)) {
|
||||
lo->lo_state = Lo_rundown;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1761,8 +1743,6 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
|
||||
__loop_clr_fd(lo, true);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1776,7 +1756,6 @@ static void lo_free_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = {
|
||||
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
||||
.open = lo_open,
|
||||
.release = lo_release,
|
||||
.ioctl = lo_ioctl,
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
|
||||
@ -2030,7 +2009,6 @@ static int loop_add(int i)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!part_shift)
|
||||
disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART;
|
||||
atomic_set(&lo->lo_refcnt, 0);
|
||||
mutex_init(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
lo->lo_number = i;
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&lo->lo_lock);
|
||||
@ -2120,13 +2098,12 @@ static int loop_control_remove(int idx)
|
||||
ret = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto mark_visible;
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound ||
|
||||
atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) {
|
||||
if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound || disk_openers(lo->lo_disk) > 0) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
goto mark_visible;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Mark this loop device no longer open()-able. */
|
||||
/* Mark this loop device as no more bound, but not quite unbound yet */
|
||||
lo->lo_state = Lo_deleting;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ struct loop_func_table;
|
||||
|
||||
struct loop_device {
|
||||
int lo_number;
|
||||
atomic_t lo_refcnt;
|
||||
loff_t lo_offset;
|
||||
loff_t lo_sizelimit;
|
||||
int lo_flags;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user