renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-29 15:43:59 +08:00
Code

iwlwifi: mvm: rs: update expected TPT tables if aggregation changed

Browse Source 
Expected TPT table was updated only when switching to a new
modulation. This is wrong as toggling aggregation changes
the expected TPT signficantly.
This leads to scenarios where turning aggregation on after
being in MIMO sends us back to SISO despite a perfect success
ratio.
This occurred because the TPT of the SISO mode was being
estimated based on aggregation while the MIMO one wasn't.

Also remove an error print which isn't an error anymore
since we might be updating the expected TPT table due
to aggregation changes.

Signed-off-by: Eyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eyal Shapira 2013-11-21 01:12:11 +02:00 committed by Emmanuel Grumbach
parent d17334c440
commit 9d015a0334
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
View File

@ -1717,6 +1717,7 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
u16 high_low;
s32 sr;
u8 tid = IWL_MAX_TID_COUNT;
u8 prev_agg = lq_sta->is_agg;
struct iwl_mvm_sta *sta_priv = (void *)sta->drv_priv;
struct iwl_mvm_tid_data *tid_data;
@ -1752,6 +1753,13 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
tbl = &(lq_sta->lq_info[active_tbl]);
if (prev_agg != lq_sta->is_agg) {
IWL_DEBUG_RATE(mvm,
"Aggregation changed: prev %d current %d. Update expected TPT table\n",
prev_agg, lq_sta->is_agg);
rs_set_expected_tpt_table(lq_sta, tbl);
}
/* current tx rate */
index = lq_sta->last_txrate_idx;
@ -1837,8 +1845,6 @@ static void rs_rate_scale_perform(struct iwl_mvm *mvm,
* actual average throughput */
if (window->average_tpt != ((window->success_ratio *
tbl->expected_tpt[index] + 64) / 128)) {
IWL_ERR(mvm,
"expected_tpt should have been calculated by now\n");
window->average_tpt = ((window->success_ratio *
tbl->expected_tpt[index] + 64) / 128);
}