mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-22 12:14:01 +08:00
mm/slub: make add_full() condition more explicit
The commit below is incomplete, as it didn't handle the add_full() part.
commit a4d3f8916c
("slub: remove useless kmem_cache_debug() before
remove_full()")
This patch checks for SLAB_STORE_USER instead of kmem_cache_debug(), since
that should be the only context in which we need the list_lock for
add_full().
Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.wu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang6@zte.com.cn>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200811020240.1231-1-wuyun.wu@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f986d998a
commit
9cf7a11183
@ -2245,7 +2245,8 @@ redo:
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
m = M_FULL;
|
||||
if (kmem_cache_debug(s) && !lock) {
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
|
||||
if ((s->flags & SLAB_STORE_USER) && !lock) {
|
||||
lock = 1;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This also ensures that the scanning of full
|
||||
@ -2254,6 +2255,7 @@ redo:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock(&n->list_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (l != m) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user