renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-19 02:34:01 +08:00
Code

um: should hold tasklist_lock while traversing processes

Browse Source 
Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it is
unsafe.

p.s.  However, I'm not sure that calling os_kill_ptraced_process() in the
atomic context is correct.  It seem to work, but please take a closer
look.

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Anton Vorontsov 2012-05-31 16:26:25 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent af1be5a578
commit 9bd0a07712
1 changed files with 3 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
arch/um/kernel/reboot.c
View File

@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*/
#include "linux/sched.h"
#include "linux/spinlock.h"
#include "linux/slab.h"
#include "kern_util.h"
#include "os.h"
@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ static void kill_off_processes(void)
struct task_struct *p;
int pid;
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (p->mm == NULL)
continue;
@ -29,6 +31,7 @@ static void kill_off_processes(void)
pid = p->mm->context.id.u.pid;
os_kill_ptraced_process(pid, 1);
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
}