mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-27 22:53:55 +08:00
rtl8192cu: Fix missing firmware load
In commit 3ac5e26a1e
entitled
"rtlwifi: rtl8192c-common: Change common firmware routines for addition
of rtl8192se and rtl8192de", the firmware loading code was moved.
Unfortunately, some necessary code was dropped for rtl8192cu.
The dmesg output shows the following:
rtl8192c: Loading firmware file rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw.bin
rtl8192c_common:_rtl92c_fw_free_to_go():<0-0> Polling FW ready fail!! REG_MCUFWDL:0x00000006 .
rtl8192c_common:rtl92c_download_fw():<0-0> Firmware is not ready to run!
In addition, the interface will authenticate and associate, but cannot
transfer data.
This is reported as Kernel Bug #38012.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa7ccfb170
commit
9935d12651
@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ MODULE_FIRMWARE("rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw.bin");
|
||||
static int rtl92cu_init_sw_vars(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
|
||||
const struct firmware *firmware;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
rtlpriv->dm.dm_initialgain_enable = 1;
|
||||
rtlpriv->dm.dm_flag = 0;
|
||||
@ -64,6 +66,24 @@ static int rtl92cu_init_sw_vars(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
|
||||
("Can't alloc buffer for fw.\n"));
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* request fw */
|
||||
err = request_firmware(&firmware, rtlpriv->cfg->fw_name,
|
||||
rtlpriv->io.dev);
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_ERR, DBG_EMERG,
|
||||
("Failed to request firmware!\n"));
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (firmware->size > 0x4000) {
|
||||
RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_ERR, DBG_EMERG,
|
||||
("Firmware is too big!\n"));
|
||||
release_firmware(firmware);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
memcpy(rtlpriv->rtlhal.pfirmware, firmware->data, firmware->size);
|
||||
rtlpriv->rtlhal.fwsize = firmware->size;
|
||||
release_firmware(firmware);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user