mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-22 20:23:57 +08:00
scsi: lpfc: Fix NVME PRLI handling during RSCN
A race condition was found whereby the initiator would receive the RSCN for a new NVME device before it had a chance to register its FC4 support with the fabric. Thus, when queried by the initiator, it would see that the target supported FC-NVME. Corrected by making the assumption that the target always supports FC-NVME thus a PRLI is sent. It's ok for the target to reject it. Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b40d02b8b
commit
991f0c0e33
@ -2177,6 +2177,16 @@ lpfc_issue_els_prli(struct lpfc_vport *vport, struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp,
|
||||
uint16_t cmdsize;
|
||||
u32 local_nlp_type, elscmd;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are in RSCN mode, the FC4 types supported from a
|
||||
* previous GFT_ID command may not be accurate. So, if we
|
||||
* are a NVME Initiator, always look for the possibility of
|
||||
* the remote NPort beng a NVME Target.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (phba->sli_rev == LPFC_SLI_REV4 &&
|
||||
vport->fc_flag & FC_RSCN_MODE &&
|
||||
vport->nvmei_support)
|
||||
ndlp->nlp_fc4_type |= NLP_FC4_NVME;
|
||||
local_nlp_type = ndlp->nlp_fc4_type;
|
||||
|
||||
send_next_prli:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user