mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-14 08:13:56 +08:00
crypto: skcipher - Add default key size helper
While converting ecryptfs over to skcipher I found that it needs to pick a default key size if one isn't given. Rather than having it poke into the guts of the algorithm to get max_keysize, let's provide a helper that is meant to give a sane default (just in case we ever get an algorithm that has no maximum key size). Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7768fb2ee9
commit
973fb3fb50
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static int crypto_init_skcipher_ops_blkcipher(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
|
||||
skcipher->decrypt = skcipher_decrypt_blkcipher;
|
||||
|
||||
skcipher->ivsize = crypto_blkcipher_ivsize(blkcipher);
|
||||
skcipher->has_setkey = calg->cra_blkcipher.max_keysize;
|
||||
skcipher->keysize = calg->cra_blkcipher.max_keysize;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static int crypto_init_skcipher_ops_ablkcipher(struct crypto_tfm *tfm)
|
||||
skcipher->ivsize = crypto_ablkcipher_ivsize(ablkcipher);
|
||||
skcipher->reqsize = crypto_ablkcipher_reqsize(ablkcipher) +
|
||||
sizeof(struct ablkcipher_request);
|
||||
skcipher->has_setkey = calg->cra_ablkcipher.max_keysize;
|
||||
skcipher->keysize = calg->cra_ablkcipher.max_keysize;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ struct crypto_skcipher {
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned int ivsize;
|
||||
unsigned int reqsize;
|
||||
|
||||
bool has_setkey;
|
||||
unsigned int keysize;
|
||||
|
||||
struct crypto_tfm base;
|
||||
};
|
||||
@ -309,7 +308,13 @@ static inline int crypto_skcipher_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm,
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool crypto_skcipher_has_setkey(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return tfm->has_setkey;
|
||||
return tfm->keysize;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned int crypto_skcipher_default_keysize(
|
||||
struct crypto_skcipher *tfm)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return tfm->keysize;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user