2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-25 21:54:06 +08:00

scsi: lpfc: Fix hardlockup in lpfc_abort_handler

In lpfc_abort_handler, the lock acquire order is hbalock (irqsave),
buf_lock (irq) and ring_lock (irq).  The issue is that in two places the
locks are released out of order - the buf_lock and the hbalock - resulting
in the cpu preemption/lock flags getting restored out of order and
deadlocking the cpu.

Fix the unlock order by fully releasing the hbalocks as well.

CC: Zhangguanghui <zhang.guanghui@h3c.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191018211832.7917-7-jsmart2021@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
James Smart 2019-10-18 14:18:22 -07:00 committed by Martin K. Petersen
parent 324e1c4020
commit 91a52b617c

View File

@ -4848,20 +4848,21 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
ret_val = __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, LPFC_FCP_RING,
abtsiocb, 0);
}
/* no longer need the lock after this point */
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
if (ret_val == IOCB_ERROR) {
/* Indicate the IO is not being aborted by the driver. */
iocb->iocb_flag &= ~LPFC_DRIVER_ABORTED;
lpfc_cmd->waitq = NULL;
spin_unlock(&lpfc_cmd->buf_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, abtsiocb);
ret = FAILED;
goto out;
}
/* no longer need the lock after this point */
spin_unlock(&lpfc_cmd->buf_lock);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
if (phba->cfg_poll & DISABLE_FCP_RING_INT)
lpfc_sli_handle_fast_ring_event(phba,