mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-19 16:14:13 +08:00
net: fix lock_sock_bh/unlock_sock_bh
This new sock lock primitive was introduced to speedup some user context socket manipulation. But it is unsafe to protect two threads, one using regular lock_sock/release_sock, one using lock_sock_bh/unlock_sock_bh This patch changes lock_sock_bh to be careful against 'owned' state. If owned is found to be set, we must take the slow path. lock_sock_bh() now returns a boolean to say if the slow path was taken, and this boolean is used at unlock_sock_bh time to call the appropriate unlock function. After this change, BH are either disabled or enabled during the lock_sock_bh/unlock_sock_bh protected section. This might be misleading, so we rename these functions to lock_sock_fast()/unlock_sock_fast(). Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Tested-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a56635a56f
commit
8a74ad60a5
@ -1026,15 +1026,23 @@ extern void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
|
||||
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
|
||||
#define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void lock_sock_bh(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
extern bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
|
||||
* @sk: socket
|
||||
* @slow: slow mode
|
||||
*
|
||||
* fast unlock socket for user context.
|
||||
* If slow mode is on, we call regular release_sock()
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline void unlock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk, bool slow)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
|
||||
if (slow)
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
else
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void unlock_sock_bh(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct sock *sk_alloc(struct net *net, int family,
|
||||
gfp_t priority,
|
||||
|
@ -229,15 +229,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_free_datagram);
|
||||
|
||||
void skb_free_datagram_locked(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool slow;
|
||||
|
||||
if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1))
|
||||
smp_rmb();
|
||||
else if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
slow = lock_sock_fast(sk);
|
||||
skb_orphan(skb);
|
||||
sk_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
|
||||
|
||||
/* skb is now orphaned, can be freed outside of locked section */
|
||||
__kfree_skb(skb);
|
||||
|
@ -2007,6 +2007,39 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* lock_sock_fast - fast version of lock_sock
|
||||
* @sk: socket
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This version should be used for very small section, where process wont block
|
||||
* return false if fast path is taken
|
||||
* sk_lock.slock locked, owned = 0, BH disabled
|
||||
* return true if slow path is taken
|
||||
* sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
might_sleep();
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!sk->sk_lock.owned)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note : We must disable BH
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
__lock_sock(sk);
|
||||
sk->sk_lock.owned = 1;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
|
||||
local_bh_enable();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(lock_sock_fast);
|
||||
|
||||
int sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct timeval tv;
|
||||
|
@ -1063,10 +1063,11 @@ static unsigned int first_packet_length(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&rcvq->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!skb_queue_empty(&list_kill)) {
|
||||
lock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
bool slow = lock_sock_fast(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
__skb_queue_purge(&list_kill);
|
||||
sk_mem_reclaim_partial(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1123,6 +1124,7 @@ int udp_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
|
||||
int peeked;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
int is_udplite = IS_UDPLITE(sk);
|
||||
bool slow;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check any passed addresses
|
||||
@ -1197,10 +1199,10 @@ out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
csum_copy_err:
|
||||
lock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
slow = lock_sock_fast(sk);
|
||||
if (!skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags))
|
||||
UDP_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_udplite);
|
||||
unlock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
|
||||
|
||||
if (noblock)
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
@ -1625,9 +1627,9 @@ int udp_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
|
||||
void udp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
{
|
||||
lock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
bool slow = lock_sock_fast(sk);
|
||||
udp_flush_pending_frames(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -328,6 +328,7 @@ int udpv6_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock *sk,
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
int is_udplite = IS_UDPLITE(sk);
|
||||
int is_udp4;
|
||||
bool slow;
|
||||
|
||||
if (addr_len)
|
||||
*addr_len=sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6);
|
||||
@ -424,7 +425,7 @@ out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
csum_copy_err:
|
||||
lock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
slow = lock_sock_fast(sk);
|
||||
if (!skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags)) {
|
||||
if (is_udp4)
|
||||
UDP_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk),
|
||||
@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ csum_copy_err:
|
||||
UDP6_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk),
|
||||
UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_udplite);
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlock_sock_bh(sk);
|
||||
unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & MSG_DONTWAIT)
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user