renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-11-20 08:38:24 +08:00
Code

[SCSI] zfcp: Fix evaluation of port handles in abort handler

Browse Source 
According to the FSF spec, word 0 (bytes 0-3) has the handle
specified with the abort command and word 1 (bytes 4-7) has the
handle for the command to be aborted. Fix the if statements
that try to compare those.

Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christof Schmitt 2007-12-20 12:30:23 +01:00 committed by James Bottomley
parent d1ad09db2f
commit 8627533c11
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c
View File

@ -1164,8 +1164,8 @@ zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *new_fsf_req)
{
int retval = -EINVAL;
struct zfcp_unit *unit;
unsigned char status_qual =
new_fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status_qual.word[0];
union fsf_status_qual *fsf_stat_qual =
&new_fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status_qual;
if (new_fsf_req->status & ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ERROR) {
/* do not set ZFCP_STATUS_FSFREQ_ABORTSUCCEEDED */
@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *new_fsf_req)
switch (new_fsf_req->qtcb->header.fsf_status) {
case FSF_PORT_HANDLE_NOT_VALID:
if (status_qual >> 4 != status_qual % 0xf) {
if (fsf_stat_qual->word[0] != fsf_stat_qual->word[1]) {
debug_text_event(new_fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 3,
"fsf_s_phand_nv0");
/*
@ -1207,8 +1207,7 @@ zfcp_fsf_abort_fcp_command_handler(struct zfcp_fsf_req *new_fsf_req)
break;
case FSF_LUN_HANDLE_NOT_VALID:
if (status_qual >> 4 != status_qual % 0xf) {
/* 2 */
if (fsf_stat_qual->word[0] != fsf_stat_qual->word[1]) {
debug_text_event(new_fsf_req->adapter->erp_dbf, 3,
"fsf_s_lhand_nv0");
/*