mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-19 02:34:01 +08:00
xfs: remove xfs_fs_evict_inode()
Joe Lawrence reported a list_add corruption with 4.6-rc1 when
testing some custom md administration code that made it's own
block device nodes for the md array. The simple test loop of:
for i in {0..100}; do
mknod --mode=0600 $tmp/tmp_node b $MAJOR $MINOR
mdadm --detail --export $tmp/tmp_node > /dev/null
rm -f $tmp/tmp_node
done
Would produce this warning in bd_acquire() when mdadm opened the
device node:
list_add double add: new=ffff88043831c7b8, prev=ffff8804380287d8, next=ffff88043831c7b8.
And then produce this from bd_forget from kdevtmpfs evicting a block
dev inode:
list_del corruption. prev->next should be ffff8800bb83eb10, but was ffff88043831c7b8
This is a regression caused by commit c19b3b05
("xfs: mode di_mode
to vfs inode"). The issue is that xfs_inactive() frees the
unlinked inode, and the above commit meant that this freeing zeroed
the mode in the struct inode. The problem is that after evict() has
called ->evict_inode, it expects the i_mode to be intact so that it
can call bd_forget() or cd_forget() to drop the reference to the
block device inode attached to the XFS inode.
In reality, the only thing we do in xfs_fs_evict_inode() that is not
generic is call xfs_inactive(). We can move the xfs_inactive() call
to xfs_fs_destroy_inode() without any problems at all, and this
will leave the VFS inode intact until it is completely done with it.
So, remove xfs_fs_evict_inode(), and do the work it used to do in
->destroy_inode instead.
cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6
Reported-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f55532a0c0
commit
8179c03629
@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ xfs_fs_alloc_inode(
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now that the generic code is guaranteed not to be accessing
|
||||
* the linux inode, we can reclaim the inode.
|
||||
* the linux inode, we can inactivate and reclaim the inode.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
STATIC void
|
||||
xfs_fs_destroy_inode(
|
||||
@ -938,9 +938,14 @@ xfs_fs_destroy_inode(
|
||||
|
||||
trace_xfs_destroy_inode(ip);
|
||||
|
||||
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_reclaim);
|
||||
ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_iolock.mr_lock));
|
||||
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_rele);
|
||||
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_remove);
|
||||
|
||||
xfs_inactive(ip);
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount) || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0);
|
||||
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_reclaim);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We should never get here with one of the reclaim flags already set.
|
||||
@ -987,24 +992,6 @@ xfs_fs_inode_init_once(
|
||||
"xfsino", ip->i_ino);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC void
|
||||
xfs_fs_evict_inode(
|
||||
struct inode *inode)
|
||||
{
|
||||
xfs_inode_t *ip = XFS_I(inode);
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&ip->i_iolock.mr_lock));
|
||||
|
||||
trace_xfs_evict_inode(ip);
|
||||
|
||||
truncate_inode_pages_final(&inode->i_data);
|
||||
clear_inode(inode);
|
||||
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_rele);
|
||||
XFS_STATS_INC(ip->i_mount, vn_remove);
|
||||
|
||||
xfs_inactive(ip);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We do an unlocked check for XFS_IDONTCACHE here because we are already
|
||||
* serialised against cache hits here via the inode->i_lock and igrab() in
|
||||
@ -1663,7 +1650,6 @@ xfs_fs_free_cached_objects(
|
||||
static const struct super_operations xfs_super_operations = {
|
||||
.alloc_inode = xfs_fs_alloc_inode,
|
||||
.destroy_inode = xfs_fs_destroy_inode,
|
||||
.evict_inode = xfs_fs_evict_inode,
|
||||
.drop_inode = xfs_fs_drop_inode,
|
||||
.put_super = xfs_fs_put_super,
|
||||
.sync_fs = xfs_fs_sync_fs,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user