renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-11-28 12:35:22 +08:00
Code

lib/percpu_counter: percpu_counter_add_batch() overflow/underflow

Browse Source 
Patch series "various irq handling fixes/docu updates".

If an interrupt happens between __this_cpu_read(*fbc->counters) and
this_cpu_add(*fbc->counters, amount), and that interrupt modifies the
per_cpu_counter, then the this_cpu_add() after the interrupt returns may
under/overflow.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221216150155.200389-1-manfred@colorfullife.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221216150441.200533-1-manfred@colorfullife.com
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: "Sun, Jiebin" <jiebin.sun@intel.com>
Cc: <1vier1@web.de>
Cc: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Manfred Spraul 2022-12-16 16:04:39 +01:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent a9dc087fd3
commit 805afd8300
1 changed files with 15 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
lib/percpu_counter.c
View File

@ -73,28 +73,33 @@ void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_set);
/*
* This function is both preempt and irq safe. The former is due to explicit
* preemption disable. The latter is guaranteed by the fact that the slow path
* is explicitly protected by an irq-safe spinlock whereas the fast patch uses
* this_cpu_add which is irq-safe by definition. Hence there is no need muck
* with irq state before calling this one
* local_irq_save() is needed to make the function irq safe:
* - The slow path would be ok as protected by an irq-safe spinlock.
* - this_cpu_add would be ok as it is irq-safe by definition.
* But:
* The decision slow path/fast path and the actual update must be atomic, too.
* Otherwise a call in process context could check the current values and
* decide that the fast path can be used. If now an interrupt occurs before
* the this_cpu_add(), and the interrupt updates this_cpu(*fbc->counters),
* then the this_cpu_add() that is executed after the interrupt has completed
* can produce values larger than "batch" or even overflows.
*/
void percpu_counter_add_batch(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount, s32 batch)
{
s64 count;
unsigned long flags;
preempt_disable();
local_irq_save(flags);
count = __this_cpu_read(*fbc->counters) + amount;
if (abs(count) >= batch) {
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fbc->lock, flags);
raw_spin_lock(&fbc->lock);
fbc->count += count;
__this_cpu_sub(*fbc->counters, count - amount);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fbc->lock, flags);
raw_spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
} else {
this_cpu_add(*fbc->counters, amount);
}
preempt_enable();
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_add_batch);