mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-26 06:04:14 +08:00
sched/migration: Move CPU_ONLINE into scheduler state
The alleged requirement that the migration notifier has a lower priority than perf is completely undocumented and there is no indication at all that this is true. perf does not even handle the CPU_ONLINE notification and perf really has nothing to do with migration. Move the CPU_ONLINE code into the sched_activate_cpu() state callback. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: rt@linutronix.de Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160310120025.421743581@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9cd8fa4fc
commit
7d97669933
@ -5424,17 +5424,6 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
|
||||
|
||||
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
|
||||
|
||||
case CPU_ONLINE:
|
||||
/* Update our root-domain */
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
|
||||
if (rq->rd) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
|
||||
|
||||
set_rq_online(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
|
||||
case CPU_DYING:
|
||||
sched_ttwu_pending();
|
||||
@ -7090,12 +7079,34 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
|
||||
int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
|
||||
|
||||
if (sched_smp_initialized) {
|
||||
sched_domains_numa_masks_set(cpu);
|
||||
cpuset_cpu_active();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Put the rq online, if not already. This happens:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1) In the early boot process, because we build the real domains
|
||||
* after all cpus have been brought up.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 2) At runtime, if cpuset_cpu_active() fails to rebuild the
|
||||
* domains.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
|
||||
if (rq->rd) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
|
||||
set_rq_online(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
update_max_interval();
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user