mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-17 09:43:59 +08:00
sched/fair: Make the use of prev_cpu consistent in the wakeup path
In commit:
ac66f54772
("sched/numa: Introduce migrate_swap()")
select_task_rq() got a 'cpu' argument to enable overriding of prev_cpu
in special cases (NUMA task swapping).
However, the select_task_rq_fair() helper functions: wake_affine() and
select_idle_sibling(), still use task_cpu(p) directly to work out
prev_cpu, which leads to inconsistencies.
This patch passes prev_cpu (potentially overridden by NUMA code) into
the helper functions to ensure prev_cpu is indeed the same CPU
everywhere in the wakeup path.
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mgalbraith@suse.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: yuyang.du@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466615004-3503-3-git-send-email-morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd425d4bfc
commit
772bd008cd
@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static u64 sched_vslice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int cpu);
|
||||
static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int cpu);
|
||||
static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1512,7 +1512,8 @@ balance:
|
||||
* Call select_idle_sibling to maybe find a better one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!cur)
|
||||
env->dst_cpu = select_idle_sibling(env->p, env->dst_cpu);
|
||||
env->dst_cpu = select_idle_sibling(env->p, env->src_cpu,
|
||||
env->dst_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
assign:
|
||||
task_numa_assign(env, cur, imp);
|
||||
@ -5101,18 +5102,18 @@ static int wake_wide(struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
|
||||
static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
|
||||
int prev_cpu, int sync)
|
||||
{
|
||||
s64 this_load, load;
|
||||
s64 this_eff_load, prev_eff_load;
|
||||
int idx, this_cpu, prev_cpu;
|
||||
int idx, this_cpu;
|
||||
struct task_group *tg;
|
||||
unsigned long weight;
|
||||
int balanced;
|
||||
|
||||
idx = sd->wake_idx;
|
||||
this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
||||
prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
|
||||
load = source_load(prev_cpu, idx);
|
||||
this_load = target_load(this_cpu, idx);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5277,11 +5278,10 @@ find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Try and locate an idle CPU in the sched_domain.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
|
||||
static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sched_domain *sd;
|
||||
struct sched_group *sg;
|
||||
int i = task_cpu(p);
|
||||
|
||||
if (idle_cpu(target))
|
||||
return target;
|
||||
@ -5289,8 +5289,8 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the prevous cpu is cache affine and idle, don't be stupid.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (i != target && cpus_share_cache(i, target) && idle_cpu(i))
|
||||
return i;
|
||||
if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) && idle_cpu(prev))
|
||||
return prev;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an eligible idle cpu.
|
||||
@ -5311,6 +5311,8 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
|
||||
for_each_lower_domain(sd) {
|
||||
sg = sd->groups;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cpumask_intersects(sched_group_cpus(sg),
|
||||
tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
|
||||
goto next;
|
||||
@ -5419,13 +5421,13 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
|
||||
|
||||
if (affine_sd) {
|
||||
sd = NULL; /* Prefer wake_affine over balance flags */
|
||||
if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
|
||||
if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, prev_cpu, sync))
|
||||
new_cpu = cpu;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!sd) {
|
||||
if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) /* XXX always ? */
|
||||
new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, new_cpu);
|
||||
new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu, new_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
} else while (sd) {
|
||||
struct sched_group *group;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user