renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-27 14:43:58 +08:00
Code

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix counting of ATU violations

Browse Source 
The ATU port vector contains a bit per port of the switch. The code
wrongly used it as a port number, and incremented a port counter. This
resulted in the wrong interfaces counter being incremented, and
potentially going off the end of the array of ports.

Fix this by using the source port ID for the violation, which really
is a port number.

Reported-by: Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@zii.aero>
Tested-by: Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@zii.aero>
Fixes: 65f60e4582 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Keep ATU/VTU violation statistics")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Lunn 2019-02-06 00:02:58 +01:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 9c0bda64ab
commit 75c05a74e7
1 changed files with 12 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c
View File

@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = dev_id;
struct mv88e6xxx_atu_entry entry;
int spid;
int err;
u16 val;
@ -336,6 +337,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
if (err)
goto out;
spid = entry.state;
if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_AGE_OUT_VIOLATION) {
dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
"ATU age out violation for %pM\n",
@ -344,23 +347,23 @@ static irqreturn_t mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_prob_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MEMBER_VIOLATION) {
dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
"ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x\n",
entry.mac, entry.portvec);
chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_member_violation++;
"ATU member violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n",
entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid);
chip->ports[spid].atu_member_violation++;
}
if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_MISS_VIOLATION) {
dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
"ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x\n",
entry.mac, entry.portvec);
chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_miss_violation++;
"ATU miss violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n",
entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid);
chip->ports[spid].atu_miss_violation++;
}
if (val & MV88E6XXX_G1_ATU_OP_FULL_VIOLATION) {
dev_err_ratelimited(chip->dev,
"ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x\n",
entry.mac, entry.portvec);
chip->ports[entry.portvec].atu_full_violation++;
"ATU full violation for %pM portvec %x spid %d\n",
entry.mac, entry.portvec, spid);
chip->ports[spid].atu_full_violation++;
}
mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);