mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-13 15:53:56 +08:00
sched: Fix race in migrate_swap_stop()
There is a subtle race in migrate_swap, when task P, on CPU A, decides to swap places with task T, on CPU B. Task P: - call migrate_swap Task T: - go to sleep, removing itself from the runqueue Task P: - double lock the runqueues on CPU A & B Task T: - get woken up, place itself on the runqueue of CPU C Task P: - see that task T is on a runqueue, and pretend to remove it from the runqueue on CPU B Now CPUs B & C both have corrupted scheduler data structures. This patch fixes it, by holding the pi_lock for both of the tasks involved in the migrate swap. This prevents task T from waking up, and placing itself onto another runqueue, until after migrate_swap has released all locks. This means that, when migrate_swap checks, task T will be either on the runqueue where it was originally seen, or not on any runqueue at all. Migrate_swap deals correctly with of those cases. Tested-by: Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: aarcange@redhat.com Cc: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: tglx@linutronix.de Cc: hpa@zytor.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131010181722.GO13848@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7c3f2ab7b8
commit
746023159c
@ -1049,6 +1049,8 @@ static int migrate_swap_stop(void *data)
|
||||
src_rq = cpu_rq(arg->src_cpu);
|
||||
dst_rq = cpu_rq(arg->dst_cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
double_raw_lock(&arg->src_task->pi_lock,
|
||||
&arg->dst_task->pi_lock);
|
||||
double_rq_lock(src_rq, dst_rq);
|
||||
if (task_cpu(arg->dst_task) != arg->dst_cpu)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
@ -1069,6 +1071,8 @@ static int migrate_swap_stop(void *data)
|
||||
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
double_rq_unlock(src_rq, dst_rq);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&arg->dst_task->pi_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&arg->src_task->pi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1448,15 +1448,6 @@ static inline void put_numa_group(struct numa_group *grp)
|
||||
kfree_rcu(grp, rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void double_lock(spinlock_t *l1, spinlock_t *l2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (l1 > l2)
|
||||
swap(l1, l2);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(l1);
|
||||
spin_lock_nested(l2, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void task_numa_group(struct task_struct *p, int cpupid, int flags,
|
||||
int *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1249,6 +1249,24 @@ static inline void double_unlock_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq *busiest)
|
||||
lock_set_subclass(&this_rq->lock.dep_map, 0, _RET_IP_);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void double_lock(spinlock_t *l1, spinlock_t *l2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (l1 > l2)
|
||||
swap(l1, l2);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(l1);
|
||||
spin_lock_nested(l2, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void double_raw_lock(raw_spinlock_t *l1, raw_spinlock_t *l2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (l1 > l2)
|
||||
swap(l1, l2);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(l1);
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_nested(l2, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* double_rq_lock - safely lock two runqueues
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user