renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-11-17 07:04:01 +08:00
Code

[PATCH] jbd: wait for already submitted t_sync_datalist buffer to complete

Browse Source 
In the current jbd code, if a buffer on BJ_SyncData list is dirty and not
locked, the buffer is refiled to BJ_Locked list, submitted to the IO and
waited for IO completion.

But the fsstress test showed the case that when a buffer was already
submitted to the IO just before the buffer_dirty(bh) check, the buffer was
not waited for IO completion.

Following patch solves this problem.  If it is assumed that a buffer is
submitted to the IO before the buffer_dirty(bh) check and still being
written to disk, this buffer is refiled to BJ_Locked list.

Signed-off-by: Hisashi Hifumi <hifumi.hisashi@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Hisashi Hifumi 2006-12-22 01:11:50 -08:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 6d3a25f1fb
commit 6f5a9da1af
1 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
fs/jbd/commit.c
View File

@ -248,8 +248,12 @@ write_out_data:
bufs = 0;
goto write_out_data;
}
}
else {
} else if (!locked && buffer_locked(bh)) {
__journal_file_buffer(jh, commit_transaction,
BJ_Locked);
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
put_bh(bh);
} else {
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "writeout complete: unfile");
__journal_unfile_buffer(jh);
jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);