mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-16 09:13:55 +08:00
scsi: mpt3sas: Fix for block device of raid exists even after deleting raid disk
While merging mpt3sas & mpt2sas code, we added the is_warpdrive check
condition on the wrong line
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
scsih_target_alloc(struct scsi_target *starget)
sas_target_priv_data->handle = raid_device->handle;
sas_target_priv_data->sas_address = raid_device->wwid;
sas_target_priv_data->flags |= MPT_TARGET_FLAGS_VOLUME;
- raid_device->starget = starget;
+ sas_target_priv_data->raid_device = raid_device;
+ if (ioc->is_warpdrive)
+ raid_device->starget = starget;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->raid_device_lock, flags);
return 0;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That check should be for the line sas_target_priv_data->raid_device =
raid_device;
Due to above hunk, we are not initializing raid_device's starget for
raid volumes, and so during raid disk deletion driver is not calling
scsi_remove_target() API as driver observes starget field of
raid_device's structure as NULL.
Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy <Sreekanth.Reddy@broadcom.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Fixes: 7786ab6aff
("mpt3sas: Ported WarpDrive product SSS6200 support")
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1fdd14279e
commit
6d3a56ed09
@ -1273,9 +1273,9 @@ scsih_target_alloc(struct scsi_target *starget)
|
||||
sas_target_priv_data->handle = raid_device->handle;
|
||||
sas_target_priv_data->sas_address = raid_device->wwid;
|
||||
sas_target_priv_data->flags |= MPT_TARGET_FLAGS_VOLUME;
|
||||
sas_target_priv_data->raid_device = raid_device;
|
||||
if (ioc->is_warpdrive)
|
||||
raid_device->starget = starget;
|
||||
sas_target_priv_data->raid_device = raid_device;
|
||||
raid_device->starget = starget;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioc->raid_device_lock, flags);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user