mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-29 15:43:59 +08:00
ftgmac100: Cleanup tx queue handling
We have a private lock which isn't terribly useful, and we maintain a "tx_pending" counter for information that's already available via a trivial arithmetic operation. Then we unconditionaly wake the queue even when not stopped. Finally our code in tx isn't really safe vs. a concurrent reclaim. The aspeed chips aren't SMP today but I prefer the code being right and future proof. So rip that out and replace it with more "standard" queue handling, currently with a threshold of 1 queue element, which will be increased when we implement fragmented sends. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
83617317d2
commit
6ad3d7edcb
@ -46,6 +46,9 @@
|
||||
#define MAX_PKT_SIZE 1536
|
||||
#define RX_BUF_SIZE MAX_PKT_SIZE /* must be smaller than 0x3fff */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Min number of tx ring entries before stopping queue */
|
||||
#define TX_THRESHOLD (1)
|
||||
|
||||
struct ftgmac100_descs {
|
||||
struct ftgmac100_rxdes rxdes[RX_QUEUE_ENTRIES];
|
||||
struct ftgmac100_txdes txdes[TX_QUEUE_ENTRIES];
|
||||
@ -68,9 +71,7 @@ struct ftgmac100 {
|
||||
struct sk_buff *tx_skbs[TX_QUEUE_ENTRIES];
|
||||
unsigned int tx_clean_pointer;
|
||||
unsigned int tx_pointer;
|
||||
unsigned int tx_pending;
|
||||
u32 txdes0_edotr_mask;
|
||||
spinlock_t tx_lock;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Scratch page to use when rx skb alloc fails */
|
||||
void *rx_scratch;
|
||||
@ -165,7 +166,6 @@ static int ftgmac100_reset_and_config_mac(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
priv->rx_pointer = 0;
|
||||
priv->tx_clean_pointer = 0;
|
||||
priv->tx_pointer = 0;
|
||||
priv->tx_pending = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* The doc says reset twice with 10us interval */
|
||||
if (ftgmac100_reset_mac(priv, maccr))
|
||||
@ -551,6 +551,23 @@ static int ftgmac100_next_tx_pointer(int pointer)
|
||||
return (pointer + 1) & (TX_QUEUE_ENTRIES - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u32 ftgmac100_tx_buf_avail(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Returns the number of available slots in the TX queue
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This always leaves one free slot so we don't have to
|
||||
* worry about empty vs. full, and this simplifies the
|
||||
* test for ftgmac100_tx_buf_cleanable() below
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return (priv->tx_clean_pointer - priv->tx_pointer - 1) &
|
||||
(TX_QUEUE_ENTRIES - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool ftgmac100_tx_buf_cleanable(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return priv->tx_pointer != priv->tx_clean_pointer;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool ftgmac100_tx_complete_packet(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct net_device *netdev = priv->netdev;
|
||||
@ -559,9 +576,6 @@ static bool ftgmac100_tx_complete_packet(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||
dma_addr_t map;
|
||||
|
||||
if (priv->tx_pending == 0)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
pointer = priv->tx_clean_pointer;
|
||||
txdes = &priv->descs->txdes[pointer];
|
||||
|
||||
@ -583,18 +597,31 @@ static bool ftgmac100_tx_complete_packet(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
|
||||
priv->tx_clean_pointer = ftgmac100_next_tx_pointer(pointer);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&priv->tx_lock);
|
||||
priv->tx_pending--;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&priv->tx_lock);
|
||||
netif_wake_queue(netdev);
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void ftgmac100_tx_complete(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
while (ftgmac100_tx_complete_packet(priv))
|
||||
struct net_device *netdev = priv->netdev;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Process all completed packets */
|
||||
while (ftgmac100_tx_buf_cleanable(priv) &&
|
||||
ftgmac100_tx_complete_packet(priv))
|
||||
;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Restart queue if needed */
|
||||
smp_mb();
|
||||
if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(netdev) &&
|
||||
ftgmac100_tx_buf_avail(priv) >= TX_THRESHOLD)) {
|
||||
struct netdev_queue *txq;
|
||||
|
||||
txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, 0);
|
||||
__netif_tx_lock(txq, smp_processor_id());
|
||||
if (netif_queue_stopped(netdev) &&
|
||||
ftgmac100_tx_buf_avail(priv) >= TX_THRESHOLD)
|
||||
netif_wake_queue(netdev);
|
||||
__netif_tx_unlock(txq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ftgmac100_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
@ -652,17 +679,22 @@ static int ftgmac100_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ftgmac100_txdes_set_dma_own(txdes);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Update next TX pointer */
|
||||
priv->tx_pointer = ftgmac100_next_tx_pointer(pointer);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&priv->tx_lock);
|
||||
priv->tx_pending++;
|
||||
if (priv->tx_pending == TX_QUEUE_ENTRIES)
|
||||
/* If there isn't enough room for all the fragments of a new packet
|
||||
* in the TX ring, stop the queue. The sequence below is race free
|
||||
* vs. a concurrent restart in ftgmac100_poll()
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(ftgmac100_tx_buf_avail(priv) < TX_THRESHOLD)) {
|
||||
netif_stop_queue(netdev);
|
||||
|
||||
/* start transmit */
|
||||
ftgmac100_txdes_set_dma_own(txdes);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&priv->tx_lock);
|
||||
/* Order the queue stop with the test below */
|
||||
smp_mb();
|
||||
if (ftgmac100_tx_buf_avail(priv) >= TX_THRESHOLD)
|
||||
netif_wake_queue(netdev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ftgmac100_txdma_normal_prio_start_polling(priv);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -980,17 +1012,17 @@ static bool ftgmac100_check_rx(struct ftgmac100 *priv)
|
||||
static int ftgmac100_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ftgmac100 *priv = container_of(napi, struct ftgmac100, napi);
|
||||
bool more, completed = true;
|
||||
int rx = 0;
|
||||
int work_done = 0;
|
||||
bool more;
|
||||
|
||||
ftgmac100_tx_complete(priv);
|
||||
/* Handle TX completions */
|
||||
if (ftgmac100_tx_buf_cleanable(priv))
|
||||
ftgmac100_tx_complete(priv);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Handle RX packets */
|
||||
do {
|
||||
more = ftgmac100_rx_packet(priv, &rx);
|
||||
} while (more && rx < budget);
|
||||
|
||||
if (more && rx == budget)
|
||||
completed = false;
|
||||
more = ftgmac100_rx_packet(priv, &work_done);
|
||||
} while (more && work_done < budget);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/* The interrupt is telling us to kick the MAC back to life
|
||||
@ -1004,11 +1036,13 @@ static int ftgmac100_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
priv->base + FTGMAC100_OFFSET_IER);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Keep NAPI going if we have still packets to reclaim */
|
||||
if (priv->tx_pending)
|
||||
return budget;
|
||||
/* As long as we are waiting for transmit packets to be
|
||||
* completed we keep NAPI going
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ftgmac100_tx_buf_cleanable(priv))
|
||||
work_done = budget;
|
||||
|
||||
if (completed) {
|
||||
if (work_done < budget) {
|
||||
/* We are about to re-enable all interrupts. However
|
||||
* the HW has been latching RX/TX packet interrupts while
|
||||
* they were masked. So we clear them first, then we need
|
||||
@ -1016,7 +1050,8 @@ static int ftgmac100_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
iowrite32(FTGMAC100_INT_RXTX,
|
||||
priv->base + FTGMAC100_OFFSET_ISR);
|
||||
if (ftgmac100_check_rx(priv) || priv->tx_pending)
|
||||
if (ftgmac100_check_rx(priv) ||
|
||||
ftgmac100_tx_buf_cleanable(priv))
|
||||
return budget;
|
||||
|
||||
/* deschedule NAPI */
|
||||
@ -1027,7 +1062,7 @@ static int ftgmac100_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
||||
priv->base + FTGMAC100_OFFSET_IER);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return rx;
|
||||
return work_done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int ftgmac100_init_all(struct ftgmac100 *priv, bool ignore_alloc_err)
|
||||
@ -1355,8 +1390,6 @@ static int ftgmac100_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
priv->dev = &pdev->dev;
|
||||
INIT_WORK(&priv->reset_task, ftgmac100_reset_task);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_init(&priv->tx_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* map io memory */
|
||||
priv->res = request_mem_region(res->start, resource_size(res),
|
||||
dev_name(&pdev->dev));
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user