mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-15 08:44:14 +08:00
carl9170: tx: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment 3.a, it can be used if "3. The referenced data structure has already been exposed to readers either at compile time or via rcu_assign_pointer() -and- a. You have not made -any- reader-visible changes to this structure since then". This case fulfills the conditions above because between the rcu_dereference() call (cvif = rcu_dereference(ar->beacon_iter);) and the rcu_assign_pointer() call there is no update of the "cvif" variable. Therefore, this patch makes the replacement. The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used: @@ identifier v; @@ v = rcu_dereference(...); ... when != rcu_dereference(...); when != v = ...; when != (<+...v...+>)++; when != \(memcpy\|memset\)(...); ( - rcu_assign_pointer + RCU_INIT_POINTER (..., v); | if(...) { ... when != v = ...; - rcu_assign_pointer + RCU_INIT_POINTER (..., v); ... when any } ) Because there are cases where between a “rcu_dereference()” call and a “rcu_assign_pointer()” call might be updates of the value that interests us, the Coccinelle semantic patch ignores them and replaces with "RCU_INIT_POINTER()" only when the update is not happening. Signed-off-by: Andreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com> Acked-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a7c5b7ef0
commit
6a5d088a92
@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ static struct carl9170_vif_info *carl9170_pick_beaconing_vif(struct ar9170 *ar)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(ar->beacon_iter, cvif);
|
||||
RCU_INIT_POINTER(ar->beacon_iter, cvif);
|
||||
return cvif;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user