mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-29 07:34:06 +08:00
[media] stv090x: remove indent levels in stv090x_get_coldlock()
This code is needlessly complicated and checkpatch.pl complains that we go over the 80 characters per line limit. If we flip the "if (!lock) {" test to "if (lock) return;" then we can remove an indent level from the rest of the function. We can add two returns in the "if (state->srate >= 10000000) {" condition and move the else statement back an additional indent level. There is another "if (!lock) {" check which can be removed since we have already checked "lock" and know it is zero at this point. This second check on "lock" is also a problem because it sets off a static checker warning. I have reviewed this code for some time to see if something else was intended, but have concluded that it was simply an oversight and should be removed. Removing this duplicative check gains us an third indent level. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9fd1f310a1
commit
66ae9fc237
@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
|
||||
|
||||
u32 reg;
|
||||
s32 car_step, steps, cur_step, dir, freq, timeout_lock;
|
||||
int lock = 0;
|
||||
int lock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (state->srate >= 10000000)
|
||||
timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 3;
|
||||
@ -2154,18 +2154,20 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
|
||||
timeout_lock = timeout_dmd / 2;
|
||||
|
||||
lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_lock); /* cold start wait */
|
||||
if (!lock) {
|
||||
if (lock)
|
||||
return lock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (state->srate >= 10000000) {
|
||||
if (stv090x_chk_tmg(state)) {
|
||||
if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x1f) < 0)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
if (STV090x_WRITE_DEMOD(state, DMDISTATE, 0x15) < 0)
|
||||
goto err;
|
||||
lock = stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
lock = 0;
|
||||
return stv090x_get_dmdlock(state, timeout_dmd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (state->srate <= 4000000)
|
||||
car_step = 1000;
|
||||
else if (state->srate <= 7000000)
|
||||
@ -2186,7 +2188,6 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
|
||||
cur_step = 1;
|
||||
dir = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lock) {
|
||||
freq = state->frequency;
|
||||
state->tuner_bw = stv090x_car_width(state->srate, state->rolloff) + state->srate;
|
||||
while ((cur_step <= steps) && (!lock)) {
|
||||
@ -2244,9 +2245,6 @@ static int stv090x_get_coldlock(struct stv090x_state *state, s32 timeout_dmd)
|
||||
dir *= -1;
|
||||
cur_step++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return lock;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user