mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-20 08:38:24 +08:00
[NETFILTER]: ip_conntrack: properly use RCU API for ip_ct_protos array
Replace preempt_{enable,disable} based RCU by proper use of the RCU API and add missing rcu_read_lock/rcu_read_unlock calls in all paths not obviously only used within packet process context (nfnetlink_conntrack). Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e22a054869
commit
642d628b2c
@ -318,9 +318,11 @@ destroy_conntrack(struct nf_conntrack *nfct)
|
||||
/* To make sure we don't get any weird locking issues here:
|
||||
* destroy_conntrack() MUST NOT be called with a write lock
|
||||
* to ip_conntrack_lock!!! -HW */
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
proto = __ip_conntrack_proto_find(ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.dst.protonum);
|
||||
if (proto && proto->destroy)
|
||||
proto->destroy(ct);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
if (ip_conntrack_destroyed)
|
||||
ip_conntrack_destroyed(ct);
|
||||
@ -595,13 +597,13 @@ ip_conntrack_proto_find_get(u_int8_t protocol)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ip_conntrack_protocol *p;
|
||||
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
p = __ip_conntrack_proto_find(protocol);
|
||||
if (p) {
|
||||
if (!try_module_get(p->me))
|
||||
p = &ip_conntrack_generic_protocol;
|
||||
}
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
return p;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -830,6 +832,7 @@ unsigned int ip_conntrack_in(unsigned int hooknum,
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/* rcu_read_lock()ed by nf_hook_slow */
|
||||
proto = __ip_conntrack_proto_find((*pskb)->nh.iph->protocol);
|
||||
|
||||
/* It may be an special packet, error, unclean...
|
||||
@ -875,8 +878,15 @@ unsigned int ip_conntrack_in(unsigned int hooknum,
|
||||
int invert_tuplepr(struct ip_conntrack_tuple *inverse,
|
||||
const struct ip_conntrack_tuple *orig)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ip_ct_invert_tuple(inverse, orig,
|
||||
__ip_conntrack_proto_find(orig->dst.protonum));
|
||||
struct ip_conntrack_protocol *proto;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
proto = __ip_conntrack_proto_find(orig->dst.protonum);
|
||||
ret = ip_ct_invert_tuple(inverse, orig, proto);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Would two expected things clash? */
|
||||
@ -1507,11 +1517,11 @@ int __init ip_conntrack_init(void)
|
||||
/* Don't NEED lock here, but good form anyway. */
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&ip_conntrack_lock);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < MAX_IP_CT_PROTO; i++)
|
||||
ip_ct_protos[i] = &ip_conntrack_generic_protocol;
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(ip_ct_protos[i], &ip_conntrack_generic_protocol);
|
||||
/* Sew in builtin protocols. */
|
||||
ip_ct_protos[IPPROTO_TCP] = &ip_conntrack_protocol_tcp;
|
||||
ip_ct_protos[IPPROTO_UDP] = &ip_conntrack_protocol_udp;
|
||||
ip_ct_protos[IPPROTO_ICMP] = &ip_conntrack_protocol_icmp;
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(ip_ct_protos[IPPROTO_TCP], &ip_conntrack_protocol_tcp);
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(ip_ct_protos[IPPROTO_UDP], &ip_conntrack_protocol_udp);
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(ip_ct_protos[IPPROTO_ICMP], &ip_conntrack_protocol_icmp);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&ip_conntrack_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* For use by ipt_REJECT */
|
||||
|
@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ int ip_conntrack_protocol_register(struct ip_conntrack_protocol *proto)
|
||||
ret = -EBUSY;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ip_ct_protos[proto->proto] = proto;
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(ip_ct_protos[proto->proto], proto);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&ip_conntrack_lock);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
@ -805,11 +805,10 @@ int ip_conntrack_protocol_register(struct ip_conntrack_protocol *proto)
|
||||
void ip_conntrack_protocol_unregister(struct ip_conntrack_protocol *proto)
|
||||
{
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&ip_conntrack_lock);
|
||||
ip_ct_protos[proto->proto] = &ip_conntrack_generic_protocol;
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(ip_ct_protos[proto->proto],
|
||||
&ip_conntrack_generic_protocol);
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&ip_conntrack_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Somebody could be still looking at the proto in bh. */
|
||||
synchronize_net();
|
||||
synchronize_rcu();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Remove all contrack entries for this protocol */
|
||||
ip_ct_iterate_cleanup(kill_proto, &proto->proto);
|
||||
|
@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ int ip_nat_icmp_reply_translation(struct ip_conntrack *ct,
|
||||
struct icmphdr icmp;
|
||||
struct iphdr ip;
|
||||
} *inside;
|
||||
struct ip_conntrack_protocol *proto;
|
||||
struct ip_conntrack_tuple inner, target;
|
||||
int hdrlen = (*pskb)->nh.iph->ihl * 4;
|
||||
enum ip_conntrack_dir dir = CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo);
|
||||
@ -455,10 +456,11 @@ int ip_nat_icmp_reply_translation(struct ip_conntrack *ct,
|
||||
DEBUGP("icmp_reply_translation: translating error %p manp %u dir %s\n",
|
||||
*pskb, manip, dir == IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL ? "ORIG" : "REPLY");
|
||||
|
||||
/* rcu_read_lock()ed by nf_hook_slow */
|
||||
proto = __ip_conntrack_proto_find(inside->ip.protocol);
|
||||
if (!ip_ct_get_tuple(&inside->ip, *pskb, (*pskb)->nh.iph->ihl*4 +
|
||||
sizeof(struct icmphdr) + inside->ip.ihl*4,
|
||||
&inner,
|
||||
__ip_conntrack_proto_find(inside->ip.protocol)))
|
||||
&inner, proto))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Change inner back to look like incoming packet. We do the
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user