mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-19 18:53:52 +08:00
mm: treat memory.low value inclusive
If memcg's usage is equal to the memory.low value, avoid reclaiming from this cgroup while there is a surplus of reclaimable memory. This sounds more logical and also matches memory.high and memory.max behavior: both are inclusive. Empty cgroups are not considered protected, so MEMCG_LOW events are not emitted for empty cgroups, if there is no more reclaimable memory in the system. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180406122132.GA7185@castle Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
230671533d
commit
5f93ad6743
@ -5344,14 +5344,14 @@ struct cgroup_subsys memory_cgrp_subsys = {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* mem_cgroup_low - check if memory consumption is below the normal range
|
||||
* mem_cgroup_low - check if memory consumption is in the normal range
|
||||
* @root: the top ancestor of the sub-tree being checked
|
||||
* @memcg: the memory cgroup to check
|
||||
*
|
||||
* WARNING: This function is not stateless! It can only be used as part
|
||||
* of a top-down tree iteration, not for isolated queries.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns %true if memory consumption of @memcg is below the normal range.
|
||||
* Returns %true if memory consumption of @memcg is in the normal range.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @root is exclusive; it is never low when looked at directly
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -5445,7 +5445,7 @@ bool mem_cgroup_low(struct mem_cgroup *root, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
|
||||
elow = min(elow, parent_elow * low_usage / siblings_low_usage);
|
||||
exit:
|
||||
memcg->memory.elow = elow;
|
||||
return usage < elow;
|
||||
return usage && usage <= elow;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user