mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-18 18:23:53 +08:00
mm, reclaim: cleanup should_continue_reclaim()
After commit "mm, reclaim: make should_continue_reclaim perform dryrun detection", closer look at the function shows, that nr_reclaimed == 0 means the function will always return false. And since non-zero nr_reclaimed implies non_zero nr_scanned, testing nr_scanned serves no purpose, and so does the testing for __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL. This patch thus cleans up the function to test only !nr_reclaimed upfront, and remove the __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL test and nr_scanned parameter completely. Comment is also updated, explaining that approximating "full LRU list has been scanned" with nr_scanned == 0 didn't really work. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190806014744.15446-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1c6c15971e
commit
5ee04716c4
43
mm/vmscan.c
43
mm/vmscan.c
@ -2586,7 +2586,6 @@ static bool in_reclaim_compaction(struct scan_control *sc)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
|
||||
unsigned long nr_reclaimed,
|
||||
unsigned long nr_scanned,
|
||||
struct scan_control *sc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long pages_for_compaction;
|
||||
@ -2597,28 +2596,18 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
|
||||
if (!in_reclaim_compaction(sc))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Consider stopping depending on scan and reclaim activity */
|
||||
if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL allocations, stop reclaiming if the
|
||||
* full LRU list has been scanned and we are still failing
|
||||
* to reclaim pages. This full LRU scan is potentially
|
||||
* expensive but a __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL caller really wants to succeed
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!nr_reclaimed && !nr_scanned)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For non-__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL allocations which can presumably
|
||||
* fail without consequence, stop if we failed to reclaim
|
||||
* any pages from the last SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX number of
|
||||
* pages that were scanned. This will return to the
|
||||
* caller faster at the risk reclaim/compaction and
|
||||
* the resulting allocation attempt fails
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!nr_reclaimed)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Stop if we failed to reclaim any pages from the last SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
|
||||
* number of pages that were scanned. This will return to the caller
|
||||
* with the risk reclaim/compaction and the resulting allocation attempt
|
||||
* fails. In the past we have tried harder for __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
|
||||
* allocations through requiring that the full LRU list has been scanned
|
||||
* first, by assuming that zero delta of sc->nr_scanned means full LRU
|
||||
* scan, but that approximation was wrong, and there were corner cases
|
||||
* where always a non-zero amount of pages were scanned.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!nr_reclaimed)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If compaction would go ahead or the allocation would succeed, stop */
|
||||
for (z = 0; z <= sc->reclaim_idx; z++) {
|
||||
@ -2645,11 +2634,7 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
|
||||
if (get_nr_swap_pages() > 0)
|
||||
inactive_lru_pages += node_page_state(pgdat, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
|
||||
|
||||
return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction &&
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* avoid dryrun with plenty of inactive pages
|
||||
*/
|
||||
nr_scanned && nr_reclaimed;
|
||||
return inactive_lru_pages > pages_for_compaction;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool pgdat_memcg_congested(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
|
||||
@ -2794,7 +2779,7 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
|
||||
wait_iff_congested(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
|
||||
|
||||
} while (should_continue_reclaim(pgdat, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed,
|
||||
sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc));
|
||||
sc));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Kswapd gives up on balancing particular nodes after too
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user