mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-30 13:34:44 +08:00
arm64: extable: use ex
for exception_table_entry
Subsequent patches will extend `struct exception_table_entry` with more fields, and the distinction between the entry and its `fixup` field will become more important. For clarity, let's consistently use `ex` to refer to refer to an entire entry. In subsequent patches we'll use `fixup` to refer to the fixup field specifically. This matches the naming convention used today in arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019160219.5202-10-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e8c328d7de
commit
5d0e790514
@ -8,15 +8,15 @@
|
||||
|
||||
bool fixup_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct exception_table_entry *fixup;
|
||||
const struct exception_table_entry *ex;
|
||||
|
||||
fixup = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs));
|
||||
if (!fixup)
|
||||
ex = search_exception_tables(instruction_pointer(regs));
|
||||
if (!ex)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (in_bpf_jit(regs))
|
||||
return arm64_bpf_fixup_exception(fixup, regs);
|
||||
return arm64_bpf_fixup_exception(ex, regs);
|
||||
|
||||
regs->pc = (unsigned long)&fixup->fixup + fixup->fixup;
|
||||
regs->pc = (unsigned long)&ex->fixup + ex->fixup;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user