mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-17 09:43:59 +08:00
perf: Fix the perf context switch optimization
Currently we only optimize the context switch between two contexts that have the same parent; this forgoes the optimization between parent and child context, even though these contexts could be equivalent too. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Shishkin, Alexander <alexander.shishkin@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131007164257.GH3081@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e00b12e64b
commit
5a3126d4fe
@ -899,6 +899,7 @@ static void unclone_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
|
||||
put_ctx(ctx->parent_ctx);
|
||||
ctx->parent_ctx = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ctx->generation++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u32 perf_event_pid(struct perf_event *event, struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
@ -1136,6 +1137,8 @@ list_add_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
|
||||
ctx->nr_events++;
|
||||
if (event->attr.inherit_stat)
|
||||
ctx->nr_stat++;
|
||||
|
||||
ctx->generation++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1313,6 +1316,8 @@ list_del_event(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event_context *ctx)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (event->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
|
||||
event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
|
||||
|
||||
ctx->generation++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
|
||||
@ -2149,22 +2154,38 @@ static void ctx_sched_out(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Test whether two contexts are equivalent, i.e. whether they
|
||||
* have both been cloned from the same version of the same context
|
||||
* and they both have the same number of enabled events.
|
||||
* If the number of enabled events is the same, then the set
|
||||
* of enabled events should be the same, because these are both
|
||||
* inherited contexts, therefore we can't access individual events
|
||||
* in them directly with an fd; we can only enable/disable all
|
||||
* events via prctl, or enable/disable all events in a family
|
||||
* via ioctl, which will have the same effect on both contexts.
|
||||
* Test whether two contexts are equivalent, i.e. whether they have both been
|
||||
* cloned from the same version of the same context.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Equivalence is measured using a generation number in the context that is
|
||||
* incremented on each modification to it; see unclone_ctx(), list_add_event()
|
||||
* and list_del_event().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int context_equiv(struct perf_event_context *ctx1,
|
||||
struct perf_event_context *ctx2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ctx1->parent_ctx && ctx1->parent_ctx == ctx2->parent_ctx
|
||||
&& ctx1->parent_gen == ctx2->parent_gen
|
||||
&& !ctx1->pin_count && !ctx2->pin_count;
|
||||
/* Pinning disables the swap optimization */
|
||||
if (ctx1->pin_count || ctx2->pin_count)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If ctx1 is the parent of ctx2 */
|
||||
if (ctx1 == ctx2->parent_ctx && ctx1->generation == ctx2->parent_gen)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If ctx2 is the parent of ctx1 */
|
||||
if (ctx1->parent_ctx == ctx2 && ctx1->parent_gen == ctx2->generation)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If ctx1 and ctx2 have the same parent; we flatten the parent
|
||||
* hierarchy, see perf_event_init_context().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ctx1->parent_ctx && ctx1->parent_ctx == ctx2->parent_ctx &&
|
||||
ctx1->parent_gen == ctx2->parent_gen)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Unmatched */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __perf_event_sync_stat(struct perf_event *event,
|
||||
@ -2247,7 +2268,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct perf_event_context *ctx = task->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn];
|
||||
struct perf_event_context *next_ctx;
|
||||
struct perf_event_context *parent;
|
||||
struct perf_event_context *parent, *next_parent;
|
||||
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
|
||||
int do_switch = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2259,10 +2280,18 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
parent = rcu_dereference(ctx->parent_ctx);
|
||||
next_ctx = next->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn];
|
||||
if (parent && next_ctx &&
|
||||
rcu_dereference(next_ctx->parent_ctx) == parent) {
|
||||
if (!next_ctx)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
parent = rcu_dereference(ctx->parent_ctx);
|
||||
next_parent = rcu_dereference(next_ctx->parent_ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
/* If neither context have a parent context; they cannot be clones. */
|
||||
if (!parent && !next_parent)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (next_parent == ctx || next_ctx == parent || next_parent == parent) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Looks like the two contexts are clones, so we might be
|
||||
* able to optimize the context switch. We lock both
|
||||
@ -2290,6 +2319,7 @@ static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&next_ctx->lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
if (do_switch) {
|
||||
@ -7136,7 +7166,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
perf_install_in_context(ctx, event, event->cpu);
|
||||
++ctx->generation;
|
||||
perf_unpin_context(ctx);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -7219,7 +7248,6 @@ perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->parent_ctx);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);
|
||||
perf_install_in_context(ctx, event, cpu);
|
||||
++ctx->generation;
|
||||
perf_unpin_context(ctx);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user