renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-16 01:04:08 +08:00
Code

Revert "f2fs: enhance multi-threads performance"

Browse Source 
This reports performance regression by Yuanhan Liu.
The basic idea was to reduce one-point mutex, but it turns out this causes
another contention like context swithes.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/21/11

Until finishing the analysis on this issue, I'd like to revert this for a while.

This reverts commit 78373b7319.
This commit is contained in:
Jaegeuk Kim 2015-04-21 10:40:54 -07:00
parent 5ebe6afaf0
commit 5463e7c18e
3 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
fs/f2fs/data.c
View File

@ -1513,6 +1513,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
{
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
bool locked = false;
int ret;
long diff;
@ -1533,7 +1534,13 @@ static int f2fs_write_data_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
diff = nr_pages_to_write(sbi, DATA, wbc);
if (!S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
mutex_lock(&sbi->writepages);
locked = true;
}
ret = write_cache_pages(mapping, wbc, __f2fs_writepage, mapping);
if (locked)
mutex_unlock(&sbi->writepages);
f2fs_submit_merged_bio(sbi, DATA, WRITE);

1
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
View File

@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
struct mutex cp_mutex; /* checkpoint procedure lock */
struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem; /* blocking FS operations */
struct rw_semaphore node_write; /* locking node writes */
struct mutex writepages; /* mutex for writepages() */
wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
struct inode_management im[MAX_INO_ENTRY]; /* manage inode cache */

1
fs/f2fs/super.c
View File

@ -1035,6 +1035,7 @@ try_onemore:
sbi->raw_super = raw_super;
sbi->raw_super_buf = raw_super_buf;
mutex_init(&sbi->gc_mutex);
mutex_init(&sbi->writepages);
mutex_init(&sbi->cp_mutex);
init_rwsem(&sbi->node_write);
clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING);