mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-17 09:43:59 +08:00
scsi: fix scsi_error_handler vs. scsi_host_dev_release race
b9d5c6b7ef
("[SCSI] cleanup setting task state in
scsi_error_handler()") has introduced a race between scsi_error_handler
and scsi_host_dev_release resulting in the hang when the device goes
away because scsi_error_handler might miss a wake up:
CPU0 CPU1
scsi_error_handler scsi_host_dev_release
kthread_stop()
kthread_should_stop()
test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
set_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP)
wake_up_process()
wait_for_completion()
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
schedule()
The most straightforward solution seems to be to invert the ordering of
the set_current_state and kthread_should_stop.
The issue has been noticed during reboot test on a 3.0 based kernel but
the current code seems to be affected in the same way.
[jejb: additional comment added]
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.6+
Reported-and-debugged-by: Mike Mayer <Mike.Meyer@teradata.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Odin.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
420fa2118c
commit
537b604c8b
@ -2179,8 +2179,17 @@ int scsi_error_handler(void *data)
|
||||
* We never actually get interrupted because kthread_run
|
||||
* disables signal delivery for the created thread.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
|
||||
while (true) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The sequence in kthread_stop() sets the stop flag first
|
||||
* then wakes the process. To avoid missed wakeups, the task
|
||||
* should always be in a non running state before the stop
|
||||
* flag is checked
|
||||
*/
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
if (kthread_should_stop())
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((shost->host_failed == 0 && shost->host_eh_scheduled == 0) ||
|
||||
shost->host_failed != atomic_read(&shost->host_busy)) {
|
||||
SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(1,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user