mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-20 11:13:58 +08:00
perf arm-spe: Remove size condition checking for events
In the Armv8 ARM (ARM DDI 0487F.c), chapter "D10.2.6 Events packet", it describes the event bit is valid with specific payload requirement. For example, the Last Level cache access event, the bit is defined as: E[8], byte 1 bit [0], when SZ == 0b01 , when SZ == 0b10 , or when SZ == 0b11 It requires the payload size is at least 2 bytes, when byte 1 (start counting from 0) is valid, E[8] (bit 0 in byte 1) can be used for LLC access event type. For safety, the code checks the condition for payload size firstly, if meet the requirement for payload size, then continue to parse event type. If review function arm_spe_get_payload(), it has used cast, so any bytes beyond the valid size have been set to zeros. For this reason, we don't need to check payload size anymore afterwards when parse events, thus this patch removes payload size conditions. Suggested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Al Grant <Al.Grant@arm.com> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119152441.6972-12-leo.yan@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
889d1a675f
commit
4d0f4ca273
@ -192,16 +192,13 @@ static int arm_spe_read_record(struct arm_spe_decoder *decoder)
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_TLB_ACCESS))
|
||||
decoder->record.type |= ARM_SPE_TLB_ACCESS;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((idx == 2 || idx == 4 || idx == 8) &&
|
||||
(payload & BIT(EV_LLC_MISS)))
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_LLC_MISS))
|
||||
decoder->record.type |= ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((idx == 2 || idx == 4 || idx == 8) &&
|
||||
(payload & BIT(EV_LLC_ACCESS)))
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_LLC_ACCESS))
|
||||
decoder->record.type |= ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS;
|
||||
|
||||
if ((idx == 2 || idx == 4 || idx == 8) &&
|
||||
(payload & BIT(EV_REMOTE_ACCESS)))
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_REMOTE_ACCESS))
|
||||
decoder->record.type |= ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS;
|
||||
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_MISPRED))
|
||||
|
@ -311,14 +311,12 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_event(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " NOT-TAKEN");
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_MISPRED))
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " MISPRED");
|
||||
if (packet->index > 1) {
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_LLC_ACCESS))
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " LLC-ACCESS");
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_LLC_MISS))
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " LLC-REFILL");
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_REMOTE_ACCESS))
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " REMOTE-ACCESS");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_LLC_ACCESS))
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " LLC-ACCESS");
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_LLC_MISS))
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " LLC-REFILL");
|
||||
if (payload & BIT(EV_REMOTE_ACCESS))
|
||||
arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, " REMOTE-ACCESS");
|
||||
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user