mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-18 15:44:02 +08:00
cfq-iosched: limit coop preemption
CFQ has an optimization for cooperated applications. if several io-context have close requests, they will get boost. But the optimization get abused. Considering thread a, b, which work on one file. a reads sectors s, s+2, s+4, ...; b reads sectors s+1, s+3, s +5, ... Both a and b are sequential read, so they can open idle window. a reads a sector s and goes to idle window and wakeup b. b reads sector s+1, since in current implementation, cfq_should_preempt() thinks a and b are cooperators, b will preempt a. b then reads sector s+1 and goes to idle window and wakeup a. for the same reason, a will preempt b and reads s+2. a and b will continue the circle. The circle will be very long, and a and b will occupy whole disk queue. Other applications will nearly have no chance to run. Fix this limiting coop preempt until a queue is scheduled normally again. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e6ec4fe245
commit
4b27e1bb44
@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ enum cfqq_state_flags {
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_slice_new, /* no requests dispatched in slice */
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_sync, /* synchronous queue */
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_coop, /* has done a coop jump of the queue */
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FLAG_coop_preempt, /* coop preempt */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#define CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(name) \
|
||||
@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(prio_changed);
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(slice_new);
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(sync);
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(coop);
|
||||
CFQ_CFQQ_FNS(coop_preempt);
|
||||
#undef CFQ_CFQQ_FNS
|
||||
|
||||
#define cfq_log_cfqq(cfqd, cfqq, fmt, args...) \
|
||||
@ -945,10 +947,13 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_set_active_queue(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!cfqq) {
|
||||
cfqq = cfq_get_next_queue(cfqd);
|
||||
if (cfqq)
|
||||
if (cfqq && !cfq_cfqq_coop_preempt(cfqq))
|
||||
cfq_clear_cfqq_coop(cfqq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfqq)
|
||||
cfq_clear_cfqq_coop_preempt(cfqq);
|
||||
|
||||
__cfq_set_active_queue(cfqd, cfqq);
|
||||
return cfqq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2066,8 +2071,16 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
|
||||
* if this request is as-good as one we would expect from the
|
||||
* current cfqq, let it preempt
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cfq_rq_close(cfqd, rq))
|
||||
if (cfq_rq_close(cfqd, rq) && (!cfq_cfqq_coop(new_cfqq) ||
|
||||
cfqd->busy_queues == 1)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Mark new queue coop_preempt, so its coop flag will not be
|
||||
* cleared when new queue gets scheduled at the very first time
|
||||
*/
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_coop_preempt(new_cfqq);
|
||||
cfq_mark_cfqq_coop(new_cfqq);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user