renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-19 10:44:14 +08:00
Code

ima: Fail rule parsing when asymmetric key measurement isn't supportable

Browse Source 
Measuring keys is currently only supported for asymmetric keys. In the
future, this might change.

For now, the "func=KEY_CHECK" and "keyrings=" options are only
appropriate when CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS is enabled. Make
this clear at policy load so that IMA policy authors don't assume that
these policy language constructs are supported.

Fixes: 2b60c0eced ("IMA: Read keyrings= option from the IMA policy")
Fixes: 5808611ccc ("IMA: Add KEY_CHECK func to measure keys")
Suggested-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tyler Hicks 2020-08-11 14:26:21 -05:00 committed by Mimi Zohar
parent 176377d97d
commit 48ce1ddce1
1 changed files with 4 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
View File

@ -1233,7 +1233,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
entry->func = POLICY_CHECK;
else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "KEXEC_CMDLINE") == 0)
entry->func = KEXEC_CMDLINE;
else if (strcmp(args[0].from, "KEY_CHECK") == 0)
else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS) &&
strcmp(args[0].from, "KEY_CHECK") == 0)
entry->func = KEY_CHECK;
else
result = -EINVAL;
@ -1290,7 +1291,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
case Opt_keyrings:
ima_log_string(ab, "keyrings", args[0].from);
if (entry->keyrings) {
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS) ||
entry->keyrings) {
result = -EINVAL;
break;
}