2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-15 16:53:54 +08:00

KVM: SVM: delay svm_vcpu_init_msrpm after svm->vmcb is initialized

Right now, svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments has an incorrect
dereference of vmcb->control.reserved_sw before the vmcb is checked
for being non-NULL.  The compiler is usually sinking the dereference
after the check; instead of doing this ourselves in the source,
ensure that svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments is only called
with a non-NULL VMCB.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
[Untested for now due to issues with my AMD machine. - Paolo]
This commit is contained in:
Paolo Bonzini 2021-07-26 12:39:01 -04:00
parent c33e05d9b0
commit 3fa5e8fd0a
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1406,8 +1406,6 @@ static int svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto error_free_vmsa_page;
}
svm_vcpu_init_msrpm(vcpu, svm->msrpm);
svm->vmcb01.ptr = page_address(vmcb01_page);
svm->vmcb01.pa = __sme_set(page_to_pfn(vmcb01_page) << PAGE_SHIFT);
@ -1419,6 +1417,8 @@ static int svm_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->vmcb01);
init_vmcb(vcpu);
svm_vcpu_init_msrpm(vcpu, svm->msrpm);
svm_init_osvw(vcpu);
vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x01000065;

View File

@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static inline void svm_hv_vmcb_dirty_nested_enlightenments(
* as we mark it dirty unconditionally towards end of vcpu
* init phase.
*/
if (vmcb && vmcb_is_clean(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS) &&
if (vmcb_is_clean(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS) &&
hve->hv_enlightenments_control.msr_bitmap)
vmcb_mark_dirty(vmcb, VMCB_HV_NESTED_ENLIGHTENMENTS);
}