mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-16 01:04:08 +08:00
memcg: make it work on sparse non-0-node systems
We have a single node system with node 0 disabled:
Scanning NUMA topology in Northbridge 24
Number of physical nodes 2
Skipping disabled node 0
Node 1 MemBase 0000000000000000 Limit 00000000fbff0000
NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0xfbfda000-0xfbfeffff]
This causes crashes in memcg when system boots:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
#PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
...
RIP: 0010:list_lru_add+0x94/0x170
...
Call Trace:
d_lru_add+0x44/0x50
dput.part.34+0xfc/0x110
__fput+0x108/0x230
task_work_run+0x9f/0xc0
exit_to_usermode_loop+0xf5/0x100
It is reproducible as far as 4.12. I did not try older kernels. You have
to have a new enough systemd, e.g. 241 (the reason is unknown -- was not
investigated). Cannot be reproduced with systemd 234.
The system crashes because the size of lru array is never updated in
memcg_update_all_list_lrus and the reads are past the zero-sized array,
causing dereferences of random memory.
The root cause are list_lru_memcg_aware checks in the list_lru code. The
test in list_lru_memcg_aware is broken: it assumes node 0 is always
present, but it is not true on some systems as can be seen above.
So fix this by avoiding checks on node 0. Remember the memcg-awareness by
a bool flag in struct list_lru.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190522091940.3615-1-jslaby@suse.cz
Fixes: 60d3fd32a7
("list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9852ae3fe5
commit
3e85899637
@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct list_lru {
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
|
||||
struct list_head list;
|
||||
int shrinker_id;
|
||||
bool memcg_aware;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -38,11 +38,7 @@ static int lru_shrinker_id(struct list_lru *lru)
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This needs node 0 to be always present, even
|
||||
* in the systems supporting sparse numa ids.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return !!lru->node[0].memcg_lrus;
|
||||
return lru->memcg_aware;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline struct list_lru_one *
|
||||
@ -452,6 +448,8 @@ static int memcg_init_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
lru->memcg_aware = memcg_aware;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!memcg_aware)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user