2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-22 20:23:57 +08:00

dm bufio: check new buffer allocation watermark every 30 seconds

dm-bufio checks a watermark when it allocates a new buffer in
__bufio_new().  However, it doesn't check the watermark when the user
changes /sys/module/dm_bufio/parameters/max_cache_size_bytes.

This may result in a problem - if the watermark is high enough so that
all possible buffers are allocated and if the user lowers the value of
"max_cache_size_bytes", the watermark will never be checked against the
new value because no new buffer would be allocated.

To fix this, change __evict_old_buffers() so that it checks the
watermark.  __evict_old_buffers() is called every 30 seconds, so if the
user reduces "max_cache_size_bytes", dm-bufio will react to this change
within 30 seconds and decrease memory consumption.

Depends-on: 1b0fb5a5b2 ("dm bufio: avoid a possible ABBA deadlock")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mikulas Patocka 2017-04-30 17:34:53 -04:00 committed by Mike Snitzer
parent 1b0fb5a5b2
commit 390020ad2a

View File

@ -1796,9 +1796,17 @@ static void __evict_old_buffers(struct dm_bufio_client *c, unsigned long age_hz)
struct dm_buffer *b, *tmp;
unsigned retain_target = get_retain_buffers(c);
unsigned count;
LIST_HEAD(write_list);
dm_bufio_lock(c);
__check_watermark(c, &write_list);
if (unlikely(!list_empty(&write_list))) {
dm_bufio_unlock(c);
__flush_write_list(&write_list);
dm_bufio_lock(c);
}
count = c->n_buffers[LIST_CLEAN] + c->n_buffers[LIST_DIRTY];
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(b, tmp, &c->lru[LIST_CLEAN], lru_list) {
if (count <= retain_target)
@ -1823,6 +1831,8 @@ static void cleanup_old_buffers(void)
mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
__cache_size_refresh();
list_for_each_entry(c, &dm_bufio_all_clients, client_list)
__evict_old_buffers(c, max_age_hz);