mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-18 10:13:57 +08:00
memblock: Use round_up/down() instead of memblock_align_up/down()
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
15fb09722d
commit
348968eb15
@ -41,17 +41,6 @@ static inline const char *memblock_type_name(struct memblock_type *type)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Address comparison utilities
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_align_down(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return addr & ~(size - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_align_up(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_addrs_overlap(phys_addr_t base1, phys_addr_t size1,
|
||||
phys_addr_t base2, phys_addr_t size2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -87,7 +76,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_region(phys_addr_t start, phys_
|
||||
if (end < size)
|
||||
return MEMBLOCK_ERROR;
|
||||
|
||||
base = memblock_align_down((end - size), align);
|
||||
base = round_down(end - size, align);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prevent allocations returning 0 as it's also used to
|
||||
* indicate an allocation failure
|
||||
@ -102,7 +91,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_region(phys_addr_t start, phys_
|
||||
res_base = memblock.reserved.regions[j].base;
|
||||
if (res_base < size)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
base = memblock_align_down(res_base - size, align);
|
||||
base = round_down(res_base - size, align);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return MEMBLOCK_ERROR;
|
||||
@ -486,7 +475,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init __memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, ph
|
||||
/* We align the size to limit fragmentation. Without this, a lot of
|
||||
* small allocs quickly eat up the whole reserve array on sparc
|
||||
*/
|
||||
size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
|
||||
size = round_up(size, align);
|
||||
|
||||
found = memblock_find_base(size, align, 0, max_addr);
|
||||
if (found != MEMBLOCK_ERROR &&
|
||||
@ -562,7 +551,7 @@ static phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid_region(struct memblock_region *mp,
|
||||
start = mp->base;
|
||||
end = start + mp->size;
|
||||
|
||||
start = memblock_align_up(start, align);
|
||||
start = round_up(start, align);
|
||||
while (start < end) {
|
||||
phys_addr_t this_end;
|
||||
int this_nid;
|
||||
@ -590,7 +579,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int n
|
||||
/* We align the size to limit fragmentation. Without this, a lot of
|
||||
* small allocs quickly eat up the whole reserve array on sparc
|
||||
*/
|
||||
size = memblock_align_up(size, align);
|
||||
size = round_up(size, align);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We do a bottom-up search for a region with the right
|
||||
* nid since that's easier considering how memblock_nid_range()
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user