renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-16 09:13:55 +08:00
Code

Revert "ceph: update issue_seq on cap grant"

Browse Source 
This reverts commit d91f2438d8.

The intent of issue_seq is to distinguish between mds->client messages that
(re)create the cap and those that do not, which means we should _only_ be
updating that value in the create paths.  By updating it in handle_cap_grant,
we reset it to zero, which then breaks release.

The larger question is what workload/problem made me think it should be
updated here...

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
This commit is contained in:
Sage Weil 2010-10-27 20:59:49 -07:00
parent efa4c1206e
commit 2f56f56ad9
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
fs/ceph/caps.c
View File

@ -2273,8 +2273,7 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct inode *inode, struct ceph_mds_caps *grant,
{
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
int mds = session->s_mds;
unsigned seq = le32_to_cpu(grant->seq);
unsigned issue_seq = le32_to_cpu(grant->issue_seq);
int seq = le32_to_cpu(grant->seq);
int newcaps = le32_to_cpu(grant->caps);
int issued, implemented, used, wanted, dirty;
u64 size = le64_to_cpu(grant->size);
@ -2286,8 +2285,8 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct inode *inode, struct ceph_mds_caps *grant,
int revoked_rdcache = 0;
int queue_invalidate = 0;
dout("handle_cap_grant inode %p cap %p mds%d seq %u/%u %s\n",
inode, cap, mds, seq, issue_seq, ceph_cap_string(newcaps));
dout("handle_cap_grant inode %p cap %p mds%d seq %d %s\n",
inode, cap, mds, seq, ceph_cap_string(newcaps));
dout(" size %llu max_size %llu, i_size %llu\n", size, max_size,
inode->i_size);
@ -2383,7 +2382,6 @@ static void handle_cap_grant(struct inode *inode, struct ceph_mds_caps *grant,
}
cap->seq = seq;
cap->issue_seq = issue_seq;
/* file layout may have changed */
ci->i_layout = grant->layout;