mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-26 22:24:09 +08:00
tty: serial_core, remove state checks in uart_poll*
Coverity complains about uart_state checks in polling functions. And it is indeed correct. We do something like this: struct uart_state *state = drv->state + line; if (!state) return; Adding 'line' to drv->state would move the potential NULL pointer to something near NULL and the check is useless. Even if we checked pure drv->state, nothing guarantees it is not freed and NULLed after the check. So if the only user of this interface (kgdboc) needs to assure something, this is neither the correct thing, nor place to do so. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Cc: kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fab8a02b73
commit
22077b091a
@ -2331,9 +2331,6 @@ static int uart_poll_init(struct tty_driver *driver, int line, char *options)
|
||||
int flow = 'n';
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!state)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
tport = &state->port;
|
||||
mutex_lock(&tport->mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2368,13 +2365,12 @@ static int uart_poll_get_char(struct tty_driver *driver, int line)
|
||||
struct uart_port *port;
|
||||
int ret = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (state) {
|
||||
port = uart_port_ref(state);
|
||||
if (port) {
|
||||
ret = port->ops->poll_get_char(port);
|
||||
uart_port_deref(port);
|
||||
}
|
||||
port = uart_port_ref(state);
|
||||
if (port) {
|
||||
ret = port->ops->poll_get_char(port);
|
||||
uart_port_deref(port);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2384,9 +2380,6 @@ static void uart_poll_put_char(struct tty_driver *driver, int line, char ch)
|
||||
struct uart_state *state = drv->state + line;
|
||||
struct uart_port *port;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!state)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
port = uart_port_ref(state);
|
||||
if (!port)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user