mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-19 02:34:01 +08:00
ocfs2: remove an overly aggressive BUG() in dlmfs
Don't BUG() user_dlm_unblock_lock() on the absence of the USER_LOCK_BLOCKED flag - this turns out to be a valid case. Make some of the related BUG() statements print more useful information. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab0920ce7e
commit
1f7bc828e3
@ -268,13 +268,26 @@ static void user_dlm_unblock_lock(void *opaque)
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&lockres->l_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!(lockres->l_flags & USER_LOCK_BLOCKED));
|
||||
BUG_ON(!(lockres->l_flags & USER_LOCK_QUEUED));
|
||||
mlog_bug_on_msg(!(lockres->l_flags & USER_LOCK_QUEUED),
|
||||
"Lockres %s, flags 0x%x\n",
|
||||
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* notice that we don't clear USER_LOCK_BLOCKED here. That's
|
||||
* for user_ast to do. */
|
||||
/* notice that we don't clear USER_LOCK_BLOCKED here. If it's
|
||||
* set, we want user_ast clear it. */
|
||||
lockres->l_flags &= ~USER_LOCK_QUEUED;
|
||||
|
||||
/* It's valid to get here and no longer be blocked - if we get
|
||||
* several basts in a row, we might be queued by the first
|
||||
* one, the unblock thread might run and clear the queued
|
||||
* flag, and finally we might get another bast which re-queues
|
||||
* us before our ast for the downconvert is called. */
|
||||
if (!(lockres->l_flags & USER_LOCK_BLOCKED)) {
|
||||
mlog(0, "Lockres %s, flags 0x%x: queued but not blocking\n",
|
||||
lockres->l_name, lockres->l_flags);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
|
||||
goto drop_ref;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (lockres->l_flags & USER_LOCK_IN_TEARDOWN) {
|
||||
mlog(0, "lock is in teardown so we do nothing\n");
|
||||
spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user