renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-24 05:04:00 +08:00
Code

rtmutex: Fix more prio comparisons

Browse Source 
There was a pure ->prio comparison left in try_to_wake_rt_mutex(),
convert it to use rt_mutex_waiter_less(), noting that greater-or-equal
is not-less (both in kernel priority view).

This necessitated the introduction of cmp_task() which creates a
pointer to an unnamed stack variable of struct rt_mutex_waiter type to
compare against tasks.

With this, we can now also create and employ rt_mutex_waiter_equal().

Reviewed-and-tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170323150216.455584638@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2017-03-23 15:56:14 +01:00 committed by Thomas Gleixner
parent e0aad5b44f
commit 19830e5524
1 changed files with 29 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
View File

@ -224,6 +224,12 @@ static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock,
}
#endif
/*
* Only use with rt_mutex_waiter_{less,equal}()
*/
#define task_to_waiter(p) \
&(struct rt_mutex_waiter){ .prio = (p)->prio, .deadline = (p)->dl.deadline }
static inline int
rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
@ -243,6 +249,25 @@ rt_mutex_waiter_less(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
return 0;
}
static inline int
rt_mutex_waiter_equal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *left,
struct rt_mutex_waiter *right)
{
if (left->prio != right->prio)
return 0;
/*
* If both waiters have dl_prio(), we check the deadlines of the
* associated tasks.
* If left waiter has a dl_prio(), and we didn't return 0 above,
* then right waiter has a dl_prio() too.
*/
if (dl_prio(left->prio))
return left->deadline == right->deadline;
return 1;
}
static void
rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
@ -553,7 +578,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
* enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain
* walk.
*/
if (waiter->prio == task->prio && !dl_task(task)) {
if (rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) {
if (!detect_deadlock)
goto out_unlock_pi;
else
@ -856,7 +881,8 @@ static int try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *task,
* the top waiter priority (kernel view),
* @task lost.
*/
if (task->prio >= rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)->prio)
if (!rt_mutex_waiter_less(task_to_waiter(task),
rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)))
return 0;
/*
@ -1119,7 +1145,7 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;
if (!waiter || (waiter->prio == task->prio && !dl_prio(task->prio))) {
if (!waiter || rt_mutex_waiter_equal(waiter, task_to_waiter(task))) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
return;
}