mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-17 01:34:00 +08:00
btrfs: delayed-inode: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero." [1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293
("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
29566c9c77
commit
17b238acf7
@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct btrfs_delayed_item {
|
||||
refcount_t refs;
|
||||
int ins_or_del;
|
||||
u32 data_len;
|
||||
char data[0];
|
||||
char data[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void btrfs_init_delayed_root(
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user